Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406388›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Review.

Krisztian Süveg, Ludwig Plasswilm, Thomas Iseli, Pawel Leskow, Galina Farina Fischer, Paul Martin Putora

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07554677 (Feasibility of a Co-designed PRe-radiotherapy Exercise Programme for People With Stage I-III Non-small Cell Lung cAnCEr), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07554677 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of a Co-designed PRe-radiotherapy Exercise Programme for People With Stage I-III Non-small Cell Lung cAnCEr: A Single-centre, Single Arm Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen's University, BelfastRan2026 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsLung CancerArmsExercise, radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Krisztian SüvegDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Ludwig PlasswilmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Thomas IseliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Pawel LeskowDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Galina Farina FischerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Paul Martin PutoraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Kantonsspital St. Gallen · CHUniversity of Bern · CHKantonsspital Winterthur · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement (pN2), the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care. The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is controversial.

methodsWe describe the current literature focusing on the role of PORT in completely resected NSCLC patients with pN2 involvement and reflect on its role in current guidelines.

resultsBased on the results of the recent Lung ART and PORT-C trials, the authors conclude that PORT cannot be generally recommended for all resected pN2 NSCLC patients. A substantial decrease in the locoregional relapse rate without translating into a survival benefit suggests that some patients with risk factors might benefit from PORT. This must be balanced against the risk of cardiopulmonary toxicity with potentially associated mortality. Lung ART has already changed the decision making for the use of PORT in daily practice for many European lung cancer experts, with lower rates of recommendations for PORT overall.

conclusionsPORT is still used, albeit decreasingly, for completely resected NSCLC with pN2 involvement. High-level evidence for its routine use is lacking. Further analyses are required to identify patients who would potentially benefit from PORT.

Indexed as

NSCLCPORTradiation therapyresectionrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35406388
PMCPMC8997169
OpenAlexW4223424268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.