Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406232›Full record

ReviewPolymers2022

Methodologies to Assess the Biodegradability of Bio-Based Polymers-Current Knowledge and Existing Gaps.

João Ricardo Afonso Pires, Victor Gomes Lauriano Souza, Pablo Fuciños, Lorenzo Pastrana, Ana Luísa Fernando

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ecosystem-Centered Robot Design: Toward Ecoresorbable Sustainability Robots (ESRs).Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

João Ricardo Afonso PiresMEtRiCS, Departamento de Ciências e Tecnologia da Biomassa, NOVA School of Science and Technology, FCT NOVA, Campus de Caparica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1849-0349
Victor Gomes Lauriano SouzaMEtRiCS, Departamento de Ciências e Tecnologia da Biomassa, NOVA School of Science and Technology, FCT NOVA, Campus de Caparica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8381-9780
Pablo FuciñosInternational Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory (INL), Av. Mestre José Veiga s/n, 4715-330 Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4502-1660
Lorenzo PastranaInternational Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory (INL), Av. Mestre José Veiga s/n, 4715-330 Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6637-3462
Ana Luísa FernandoMEtRiCS, Departamento de Ciências e Tecnologia da Biomassa, NOVA School of Science and Technology, FCT NOVA, Campus de Caparica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9270-3982

Funding

European Union Horizon2020, IA - Innovation Action, Grant agreement ID 862156Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/144346/2019Ministry of Science Technology and Higher Education UIDB/04077/2020 and UIDP/04077/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our society lives in a time of transition where traditional petroleum-based polymers/plastics are being replaced by more sustainable alternative materials. To consider these bioproducts as more viable options than the actual ones, it is demanded to ensure that they are fully biodegradable or compostable and that there is no release of hazardous compounds to the environment with their degradation. It is then essential to adapt the legislation to support novel specific guidelines to test the biodegradability of each biopolymer in varied environments, and consequently, establish consistent data to design a coherent labeling system. This review work aims to point out the current standards that can serve as a basis for the characterization of biopolymers' biodegradation profile in different environments (soil, compost, and aquatic systems) and identify other laboratory methodologies that have been adopted for the same purpose. With the information gathered in this work, it was possible to identify remaining gaps in existing national and international standards to help establish new validation criteria to be introduced in future research and policies related to bioplastics to boost the sustainable progress of this rising industry.

Indexed as

aquatic systemsbiodegradation assaybiopolymerscompostfood packagingsoil

Identifiers

PMID35406232
PMCPMC9002992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.