Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406193›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Assessment of the Eco-Efficiency of the Circular Economy in the Recovery of Cellulose from the Shredding of Textile Waste.

Geraldo Cardoso de Oliveira Neto, Micheline Maia Teixeira, Gabriel Luis Victorino Souza, Valquiria Demarchi Arns, Henrricco Nieves Pujol Tucci, Marlene Amorim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Geraldo Cardoso de Oliveira NetoIndustrial Engineering Post-Graduation Program, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo 03155-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4744-3963
Micheline Maia TeixeiraIndustrial Engineering Post-Graduation Program, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo 03155-000, Brazil.
Gabriel Luis Victorino SouzaIndustrial Engineering Post-Graduation Program, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo 03155-000, Brazil.
Valquiria Demarchi ArnsIndustrial Engineering Post-Graduation Program, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo 03155-000, Brazil.
Henrricco Nieves Pujol TucciIndustrial Engineering Post-Graduation Program, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo 03155-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0450-0884
Marlene AmorimGOVCOPP & DEGEIT, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0901-0614
Universidade Nove de Julho · BRUniversity of Aveiro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing demand for the adoption of cyclical processes in the fashion industry. The trends point to the reuse of cellulose from cotton fibres, obtained from industrial waste, as a substitute to the former linear processes of manufacturing, sale, use, and discarding. This study sets up to explore and assess the economic and environmental gains from the mechanical shredding of cellulose in cotton fabrics in a textile company, identifying the circularity associated with the adoption of such methods. The study resorted to a case study methodology building on interviews and observation. For the environmental estimations, the study employed the material intensity factor tool, and for the economic evaluation the study uses the return on investment. The study also offers an estimation of the circularity of the processes that were implemented. The adoption of the mechanical shredding for cotton cellulose generated economic gains of US$11,798,662.98 and a reduction in the environmental impact that amounts to 31,335,767,040.26 kg including the following different compartments: biotic, abiotic, water, air, and erosion. The findings suggest the existence of opportunities for the circular economy in the textile sector of about 99.69%, dissociated to the use of mechanical recycling, while limited by the consumption of electrical energy and lubricants in the recycling process, leading the way to a circular economy.

Indexed as

circular economyeco-efficiencyrecovery of cellulosetextile fiberstextile industry

Identifiers

PMID35406193
PMCPMC9002361
OpenAlexW4220787103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.