Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406138›Full record

ReviewNutrients2022

What Is a

Manfred J Müller, Anja Bosy-Westphal, Wiebke Braun, Michael C Wong, John A Shepherd, Steven B Heymsfield

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Metabolic scaling, energy allocation tradeoffs, and the evolution of humans' unique metabolism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Manfred J MüllerInstitute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, D 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7280-2411
Anja Bosy-WestphalInstitute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, D 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Wiebke BraunInstitute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, D 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Michael C WongUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, Shepherd Res. Lab, Honolulu, HI 96816, USA.
John A ShepherdUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, Shepherd Res. Lab, Honolulu, HI 96816, USA.
Steven B HeymsfieldPennington Biomedical Research Center, LSU System, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1127-9425
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USPennington Biomedical Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The historical 1975 Reference Man is a ‘model’ that had been used as a basis for the calculation of radiation doses, metabolism, pharmacokinetics, sizes for organ transplantation and ergonomic optimizations in the industry, e.g., to plan dimensions of seats and other formats. The 1975 Reference Man was not an average individual of a population; it was based on the multiple characteristics of body compositions that at that time were available, i.e., mainly from autopsy data. Faced with recent technological advances, new mathematical models and socio-demographic changes within populations characterized by an increase in elderly and overweight subjects a timely ‘state-of-the-art’ 2021 Reference Body are needed. To perform this, in vivo human body composition data bases in Kiel, Baton Rouge, San Francisco and Honolulu were analyzed and detailed 2021 Reference Bodies, and they were built for both sexes and two age groups (≤40 yrs and >40 yrs) at BMIs of 20, 25, 30 and 40 kg/m2. We have taken an integrative approach to address ‘structure−structure’ and ‘structure−function’ relationships at the whole-body level using in depth body composition analyses as assessed by gold standard methods, i.e., whole body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and the 4-compartment (4C-) model (based on deuterium dilution, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body densitometry). In addition, data obtained by a three-dimensional optical scanner were used to assess body shape. The future applications of the 2021 Reference Body relate to mathematical modeling to address complex metabolic processes and pharmacokinetics using a multi-level/multi-scale approach defining health within the contexts of neurohumoral and metabolic control.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueMagnetic Resonance ImagingAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedBody CompositionBody WaterFemaleHumansMaleWhole Body Imagingbody compositionbody densitybody proteinbody shapebone mineral contentfat free massfat massfunctional body compositionhydrationinsulinleptinorgan massesreference manreference womanresting energy expenditureskeletal muscle mass

Identifiers

PMID35406138
PMCPMC9003358
OpenAlexW4223639186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.