Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406085›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2022

Effects of Preoperative Oral Nutritional Supplements on Improving Postoperative Early Enteral Feeding Intolerance and Short-Term Prognosis for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Single-Center, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Feng-Jun He, Mo-Jin Wang, Kun Yang, Xiao-Long Chen, Tao Jin, Li-Li Zhu, Wen Zhuang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosisWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Nutritional care in patients undergoing laparoscopic/minimally invasive surgeries for gastrointestinal tumours.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Feng-Jun HeWest China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610044, China.
Mo-Jin WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610044, China.
Kun YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610044, China.
Xiao-Long ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610044, China.
Tao JinWest China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610044, China.
Li-Li ZhuWest China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610044, China.
Wen ZhuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610044, China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2018SZ0136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly enteral nutrition (EN) after abdominal surgery can improve the prognosis of patients. However, the high feeding intolerance (FI) rate is the primary factor impeding postoperative EN.

methodsSixty-seven patients who underwent radical subtotal or total gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) were randomly allocated to the preoperative oral nutritional supplement group (ONS group) or dietary advice alone (DA group). Both groups were fed via nasojejunal tubes (NJs) from the first day after surgery to the fifth day. The primary endpoint is the FI rate.

resultsOf the patients, 66 completed the trial (31 in the ONS group, 35 in the DA group). The FI rate in the ONS group was lower than that in the DA group (25.8% vs. 31.4%,

conclusionsThe study shows that short-term preoperative ONS cannot significantly improve FI and the energy compliance rate in the early stage after radical gastrectomy.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionStomach NeoplasmsHumansInfant, NewbornPrognosisProspective StudiesSingle-Blind Methodenhanced recovery after surgeryenteral nutritionfeeding intolerancegastric cancergastroenterostomyoral nutritional supplementsrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID35406085
PMCPMC9002901
OpenAlexW4223412213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.