Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35405971›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Telenutrition: Changes in Professional Practice and in the Nutritional Assessments of Italian Dietitian Nutritionists in the COVID-19 Era.

Patrizia Gnagnarella, Yvelise Ferro, Taira Monge, Ersilia Troiano, Tiziana Montalcini, Arturo Pujia, Elisa Mazza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Use and Perception of Video Consultations Among Swedish Dietitians Before and After COVID-19 Onset.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrizia GnagnarellaAssociazione Tecnico Scientifica dell'Alimentazione Nutrizione e Dietetica (ASAND), Technical Scientific Association of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, 90144 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0560-4706
Yvelise FerroDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University Magna Grecia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7503-6188
Taira MongeAssociazione Tecnico Scientifica dell'Alimentazione Nutrizione e Dietetica (ASAND), Technical Scientific Association of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, 90144 Palermo, Italy.
Ersilia TroianoAssociazione Tecnico Scientifica dell'Alimentazione Nutrizione e Dietetica (ASAND), Technical Scientific Association of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, 90144 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3640-9655
Tiziana MontalciniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Magna Græcia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7048-5830
Arturo PujiaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University Magna Grecia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Elisa MazzaAssociazione Tecnico Scientifica dell'Alimentazione Nutrizione e Dietetica (ASAND), Technical Scientific Association of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, 90144 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3198-7090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about various restrictions around the world, and its impact on healthcare has been enormous: RDNs have had to shift from in-person interactions with clients to telenutrition consultations, encountering obstacles. We designed the first survey to investigate the changes in RDN practices related to telenutrition provision after the onset of the pandemic through an online survey in Italy. Four hundred and thirty-six responses were analyzed. Before the pandemic, only 16% of Italian RDNs provided telenutrition; this percentage increased significantly up to 63% (p < 0.001). Among patients, the lack of interest in accessing telenutrition (30.9%) and the Internet (16.7%) were the most frequently reported barriers. Among RDNs, one of the main obstacles was their inability to conduct nutritional evaluation or monitoring activities (24.4%). Our survey indicated that increased adoption of telenutrition can be a valid, safe alternative to face-to-face visits. Telenutrition was mainly used by young RDNs (20−39 years) with fewer years of professional experience (0−20 years) and master’s degrees. Remote nutrition can enable RDNs to maintain normal workloads and provide patients with uninterrupted access to nutritional healthcare. It is important that RDNs using telemedicine resources possess the ability to provide high-quality, efficient, and secure services using evidence-based guidance.

Indexed as

COVID-19DieteticsNutritionistsHumansNutrition AssessmentPandemicsProfessional PracticeCOVID-19 pandemicdietitiansnutrition assessmenttelehealthtelenutrition

Identifiers

PMID35405971
PMCPMC9002661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.