ArticleBiopharmaceutics & drug disposition2022
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations to inform dissolution specifications and clinical relevance of release rates on elagolix exposure.
Article in Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Formulation Strategy of BCS-II Drugs by Coupling Mechanistic In-Vitro and Nonclinical In-Vivo Data with PBPK: Fundamentals of Absorption-Dissolution to Parameterization of Modelling and Simulation.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Review
- PBBM Considerations for Base Models, Model Validation, and Application Steps: Workshop Summary Report.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Best Practices for Integration of Dissolution Data into Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Models (PBBM): A Biopharmaceutics Modeling Scientist Perspective.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2023Review
- Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations to inform dissolution specifications and clinical relevance of release rates on elagolix exposure.Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this analysis was to use a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the impact of changes in dissolution rates on elagolix exposures and define clinically relevant acceptance criteria for dissolution. Varying in vitro dissolution profiles were utilized in a PBPK model to describe the absorption profiles of elagolix formulations used in Phase 3 clinical trials and for the to be marketed commercial formulations. Single dose studies of 200 mg elagolix formulations were used for model verification under fasted conditions. Additional dissolution scenarios were evaluated to assess the impact of dissolution rates on elagolix exposures. Compared to the Phase 3 clinical trial formulation, sensitivity analysis on dissolution rates suggested that a hypothetical scenario of ∼75% slower dissolution rate would result in 14% lower predicted elagolix plasma exposures, however, the predicted exposures are still within the bioequivalence boundaries of 0.8-1.25 for both C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.