Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35405437›Full record

Trial reportESMO open2022

Results from the INMUNOSUN-SOGUG trial: a prospective phase II study of sunitinib as a second-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after immune checkpoint-based combination therapy.

E Grande, T Alonso-Gordoa, O Reig, E Esteban, D Castellano, X Garcia-Del-Muro, M J Mendez, J García-Donas, M González Rodríguez, J A Arranz-Arija and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SEOM SOGUG clinical guideline for treatment of kidney cancer (2022).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

E GrandeMedical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: egrande@oncomadrid.com.
T Alonso-GordoaMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
O ReigMedical Oncology, Hospital Clinic and Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
E EstebanMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
D CastellanoMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
X Garcia-Del-MuroMedical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO Bellvitge) Idibell, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
M J MendezMedical Oncology, Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Córdoba (IMIBIC) Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia (HURS), Córdoba, Spain.
J García-DonasMedical Oncology, Clara Campal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain.
M González RodríguezMedical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
J A Arranz-ArijaMedical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
P Lopez-CriadoMedical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
J Molina-CerrilloMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
B MelladoMedical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
C Alvarez-FernandezMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
G De VelascoMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
M A Cuéllar-RivasMedical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO Bellvitge) Idibell, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
R M Rodríguez-AlonsoMedical Oncology, Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Córdoba (IMIBIC) Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia (HURS), Córdoba, Spain.
J F Rodríguez-MorenoMedical Oncology, Clara Campal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain.
C Suarez-RodriguezMedical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESHospital Universitario Reina Sofía · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe INMUNOSUN trial had the objective of prospectively evaluating the efficacy and safety of sunitinib as a pure second-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who have progressed to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies. PATIENTS AND

methodsA multicenter, phase II, single-arm, open-label study was carried out in patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of mRCC with a clear-cell component who had progressed to a first-line regimen of ICI-based therapies. All patients received sunitinib 50 mg once daily orally for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period following package insert instructions. The primary outcome was the objective response rate.

resultsTwenty-one assessable patients were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. Four patients [19.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3% to 35.8%] showed an objective response (OR), and all of them had partial responses. Additionally, 14 (67%) patients showed a stable response, leading to clinical benefit in 18 patients (85.7%, 95% CI 70.7% to 100%). Among the four assessable patients who showed an OR, the median duration of the response was 7.1 months (interquartile range 4.2-12.0 months). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months (95% CI 3.1-8.0 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 23.5 months (95% CI 6.3-40.7 months). Patients who had better antitumor response to first-line ICI-based treatment showed a longer PFS and OS with sunitinib. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea (n = 11, 52%), dysgeusia (n = 8, 38%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (n = 8, 38%), and hypertension (n = 8, 38%). There was 1 patient who exhibited grade 5 pancytopenia, and 11 patients experienced grade 3 adverse events. Eight (38%) patients had serious adverse events, four of which were considered to be related to sunitinib.

conclusionAlthough the INMUNOSUN trial did not reach the pre-specified endpoint, it demonstrated that sunitinib is active and can be safely used as a second-line option in patients with mRCC who progress to new standard ICI-based regimens.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIndolesMaleProspective StudiesSunitinibIndolesSunitinibimmune checkpoint inhibitorsmetastatic renal carcinomasecond-line treatmentsunitinib

Identifiers

PMID35405437
PMCPMC9058923
OpenAlexW4223622882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.