ArticleCirculation2022
Computational Analysis of Routine Biopsies Improves Diagnosis and Prediction of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.
Article in Circulation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac sarcoidosis: new insights beyond the granuloma using spatial proteomics.European heart journal · 2026Article
- The right kind of rarefaction: Coronary microvascular remodeling in right ventricle failure.JHLT open · 2026Article
- From the Bench to the Bedside and Back: Contemporary Applications of Basic Science to Innovations in Heart Transplantation.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2026Review
- Regulatory T cells in cardiac allograft vasculopathy: from mechanistic insights to clinical tolerance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence optimizes immune rejection prediction and management in heart transplantation: a structured narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Computational pathology assessments of cardiac stromal remodeling: Clinical correlates and prognostic implications in heart transplantation.JHLT open · 2025Article
- Revisiting Biomarkers of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: Addressing the Achilles Heel of Heart Transplantation.Current heart failure reports · 2024Review
- Swiss digital pathology recommendations: results from a Delphi process conducted by the Swiss Digital Pathology Consortium of the Swiss Society of Pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024Article
- Impact of pretransplant T2DM on left ventricular deformation and myocardial perfusion in heart transplanted recipients: a 3.0 T cardiac magnetic resonance study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Article
- Computational Pathology Assessments of Cardiac Stromal Remodeling: Clinical Correlates and Prognostic Implications in Heart Transplantation.Research square · 2024Article
- Adopting artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine: a scoping review.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024Article
- Failing to Make the Grade: Conventional Cardiac Allograft Rejection Grading Criteria Are Inadequate for Predicting Rejection Severity.Circulation. Heart failure · 2024Article
- European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on the Use of Non-invasive Biomarkers for Cardiothoracic Transplant Rejection Surveillance.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024Review
- The evolving use of biomarkers in heart transplantation: Consensus of an expert panel.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for heart transplant recipients. Although clinical risk factors for CAV have been established, no personalized prognostic test exists to confidently identify patients at high versus low risk of developing aggressive CAV. This investigation aimed to leverage computational methods for analyzing digital pathology images from routine endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) to develop a precision medicine tool for predicting CAV years before overt clinical presentation.
methodsClinical data from 1 year after transplant were collected on 302 transplant recipients from the University of Pennsylvania, including 53 patients with early-onset CAV and 249 no early-onset CAV controls. These data were used to generate a clinical model (Clinical Risk Factor Future Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Prediction Model [ClinCAV-Pr]) for predicting future CAV development. From this cohort, 183 archived EMBs were collected for CD31 and modified trichrome staining and then digitally scanned. These included 1-year posttransplant EMBs from 50 patients with early-onset CAV and 82 patients with no early-onset CAV, as well as 51 EMBs from disease control patients obtained at the time of definitive coronary angiography confirming CAV. Using biologically inspired, handcrafted features extracted from digitized EMBs, quantitative histological models for differentiating no early-onset CAV from disease controls (Histological Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Diagnostic Model [HistoCAV-Dx]) and for predicting future CAV from 1-year posttransplant EMBs were developed (Histological Future Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Prediction Model [HistoCAV-Pr]). The performance of histological and clinical models for predicting future CAV (ie, HistoCAV-Pr and ClinCAV-Pr, respectively) were compared in a held-out validation set before being combined to assess the added predictive value of an integrated predictive model (Integrated Histological/Clinical Risk Factor Future Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Prediction Model [iCAV-Pr]).
resultsClinCAV-Pr achieved modest performance on the independent test set, with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.70. The HistoCAV-Dx model for diagnosing CAV achieved excellent discrimination, with an AUROC of 0.91, whereas the HistoCAV-Pr model for predicting CAV achieved good performance with an AUROC of 0.80. The integrated iCAV-Pr model achieved excellent predictive performance, with an AUROC of 0.93 on the held-out test set.
conclusionsPrediction of future CAV development is greatly improved by incorporation of computationally extracted histological features. These results suggest morphological details contained within regularly obtained biopsy tissue have the potential to enhance precision and personalization of treatment plans for patients after heart transplant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.