Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35405081›Full record

ArticleCirculation2022

Computational Analysis of Routine Biopsies Improves Diagnosis and Prediction of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.

Eliot G Peyster, Andrew Janowczyk, Abigail Swamidoss, Samhith Kethireddy, Michael D Feldman, Kenneth B Margulies

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Adopting artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine: a scoping review.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The evolving use of biomarkers in heart transplantation: Consensus of an expert panel.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eliot G PeysterCardiovascular Research Institute (E.G.P., K.B.M.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID 0000-0002-3350-3136
Andrew JanowczykDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (A.J., A.S., S.K.).
Abigail SwamidossDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (A.J., A.S., S.K.).
Samhith KethireddyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (A.J., A.S., S.K.).
Michael D FeldmanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (M.D.F.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Kenneth B MarguliesCardiovascular Research Institute (E.G.P., K.B.M.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID 0000-0002-8093-4465
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USCardiovascular Institute of the South · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR001879 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEAGHER, EMMA ANNE · 2016 to 2025
$13.7M
Computer-Assisted Histologic Evaluation of Cardiac Allograft RejectionR01HL151277 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT, MARGULIES, KENNETH BER · 2020 to 2023
$3.2M
HistoTools: A suite of digital pathology tools for quality control, annotation and dataset identificationU01CA239055 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JANOWCZYK, ANDREW ROBERT, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2019 to 2022
$1.0M
Personalized Rejection Risk Assessment in Cardiac TransplantationK08HL159344 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PEYSTER, ELIOT · 2021 to 2024
$667k
BLRD VA IK6 BX006185NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001879NCI NIH HHS U01 CA239055NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL159344NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for heart transplant recipients. Although clinical risk factors for CAV have been established, no personalized prognostic test exists to confidently identify patients at high versus low risk of developing aggressive CAV. This investigation aimed to leverage computational methods for analyzing digital pathology images from routine endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) to develop a precision medicine tool for predicting CAV years before overt clinical presentation.

methodsClinical data from 1 year after transplant were collected on 302 transplant recipients from the University of Pennsylvania, including 53 patients with early-onset CAV and 249 no early-onset CAV controls. These data were used to generate a clinical model (Clinical Risk Factor Future Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Prediction Model [ClinCAV-Pr]) for predicting future CAV development. From this cohort, 183 archived EMBs were collected for CD31 and modified trichrome staining and then digitally scanned. These included 1-year posttransplant EMBs from 50 patients with early-onset CAV and 82 patients with no early-onset CAV, as well as 51 EMBs from disease control patients obtained at the time of definitive coronary angiography confirming CAV. Using biologically inspired, handcrafted features extracted from digitized EMBs, quantitative histological models for differentiating no early-onset CAV from disease controls (Histological Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Diagnostic Model [HistoCAV-Dx]) and for predicting future CAV from 1-year posttransplant EMBs were developed (Histological Future Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Prediction Model [HistoCAV-Pr]). The performance of histological and clinical models for predicting future CAV (ie, HistoCAV-Pr and ClinCAV-Pr, respectively) were compared in a held-out validation set before being combined to assess the added predictive value of an integrated predictive model (Integrated Histological/Clinical Risk Factor Future Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Prediction Model [iCAV-Pr]).

resultsClinCAV-Pr achieved modest performance on the independent test set, with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.70. The HistoCAV-Dx model for diagnosing CAV achieved excellent discrimination, with an AUROC of 0.91, whereas the HistoCAV-Pr model for predicting CAV achieved good performance with an AUROC of 0.80. The integrated iCAV-Pr model achieved excellent predictive performance, with an AUROC of 0.93 on the held-out test set.

conclusionsPrediction of future CAV development is greatly improved by incorporation of computationally extracted histological features. These results suggest morphological details contained within regularly obtained biopsy tissue have the potential to enhance precision and personalization of treatment plans for patients after heart transplant.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionHeart TransplantationAllograftsBiopsyCoronary AngiographyHumansallograftscardiac transplantationcomputer vision systemscoronary arteriesgraft rejectionhistologymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35405081
PMCPMC9133227
OpenAlexW4223526954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.