ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
DGCyTOF: Deep learning with graphic cluster visualization to predict cell types of single cell mass cytometry data.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Automated and reproducible cell identification in mass cytometry using neural networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Pooled it
- dioscRi enables transferable prediction of clinical outcomes in multi-parameter cytometry data.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Differential Correlation Across Subpopulations of Single Cells in Subtypes of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026Article
- Cellular immunology data enable clinical severity prediction via supervised machine learning.iScience · 2026Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in laboratory hematology: Advances, challenges, and prospects.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Automated descriptive cell type naming in flow and mass cytometry with CytoPheno.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrated workflow for analysis of immune enriched spatial proteomic data with IMmuneCite.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automated cytometric gating with human-level performance using bivariate segmentation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Optimal transport reveals immune perturbation and fingerprints over time in COVID-19 vaccination.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Cytometry masked autoencoder: An accurate and interpretable automated immunophenotyper.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
- ImmCellTyper facilitates systematic mass cytometry data analysis for deep immune profiling.eLife · 2024Article
- Recent Developments in Machine Learning for Mass Spectrometry.ACS measurement science au · 2024Review
- Automated Cytometric Gating with Human-Level Performance Using Bivariate Segmentation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- GateMeClass: Gate Mining and Classification of cytometry data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- An Explainable Deep Learning Classifier of Bovine Mastitis Based on Whole-Genome Sequence Data-Circumventing the p >> n Problem.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Identifying dynamical persistent biomarker structures for rare events using modern integrative machine learning approach.Proteomics · 2023Article
- Rapid, High-Throughput Single-Cell Multiplex In Situ Tagging (MIST) Analysis of Immunological Disease with Machine Learning.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Insights from the molecular docking and simulation analysis of P38 MAPK phytochemical inhibitor complexes.Bioinformation · 2023Article
- Application of Machine Learning for Cytometry Data.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell mass cytometry, also known as cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF) is a powerful high-throughput technology that allows analysis of up to 50 protein markers per cell for the quantification and classification of single cells. Traditional manual gating utilized to identify new cell populations has been inadequate, inefficient, unreliable, and difficult to use, and no algorithms to identify both calibration and new cell populations has been well established. A deep learning with graphic cluster (DGCyTOF) visualization is developed as a new integrated embedding visualization approach in identifying canonical and new cell types. The DGCyTOF combines deep-learning classification and hierarchical stable-clustering methods to sequentially build a tri-layer construct for known cell types and the identification of new cell types. First, deep classification learning is constructed to distinguish calibration cell populations from all cells by softmax classification assignment under a probability threshold, and graph embedding clustering is then used to identify new cell populations sequentially. In the middle of two-layer, cell labels are automatically adjusted between new and unknown cell populations via a feedback loop using an iteration calibration system to reduce the rate of error in the identification of cell types, and a 3-dimensional (3D) visualization platform is finally developed to display the cell clusters with all cell-population types annotated. Utilizing two benchmark CyTOF databases comprising up to 43 million cells, we compared accuracy and speed in the identification of cell types among DGCyTOF, DeepCyTOF, and other technologies including dimension reduction with clustering, including Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Factor Analysis (FA), Independent Component Analysis (ICA), Isometric Feature Mapping (Isomap), t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE), and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) with k-means clustering and Gaussian mixture clustering. We observed the DGCyTOF represents a robust complete learning system with high accuracy, speed and visualization by eight measurement criteria. The DGCyTOF displayed F-scores of 0.9921 for CyTOF1 and 0.9992 for CyTOF2 datasets, whereas those scores were only 0.507 and 0.529 for the t-SNE+k-means; 0.565 and 0.59, for UMAP+ k-means. Comparison of DGCyTOF with t-SNE and UMAP visualization in accuracy demonstrated its approximately 35% superiority in predicting cell types. In addition, observation of cell-population distribution was more intuitive in the 3D visualization in DGCyTOF than t-SNE and UMAP visualization. The DGCyTOF model can automatically assign known labels to single cells with high accuracy using deep-learning classification assembling with traditional graph-clustering and dimension-reduction strategies. Guided by a calibration system, the model seeks optimal accuracy balance among calibration cell populations and unknown cell types, yielding a complete and robust learning system that is highly accurate in the identification of cell populations compared to results using other methods in the analysis of single-cell CyTOF data. Application of the DGCyTOF method to identify cell populations could be extended to the analysis of single-cell RNASeq data and other omics data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.