ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Microbiome-based disease prediction with multimodal variational information bottlenecks.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding the cancer microbiome: multi-omics, AI, and translational opportunities.Genome biology · 2026Review
- Advances and future directions in identifying specific taxa from microbial meta-omics data: from pipeline to deep learning.mSystems · 2026Review
- Review
- Acute gastrointestinal injury severity assessment informs nutritional support and prognostic evaluation in critically ill children: a narrative review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Optimizing breast cancer chemotherapy by harnessing gut microbiota with insights from artificial intelligence.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Review
- Review
- MSFT-transformer: a multistage fusion tabular transformer for disease prediction using metagenomic data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Effects of snake fungal disease (ophidiomycosis) on the skin microbiome across two major experimental scales.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of machine learning-based diagnostic models using blood transcriptomics for early childhood diabetes prediction.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Utility of Machine Learning to Characterize Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and Its Clinical Implications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
- Techniques for learning and transferring knowledge for microbiome-based classification and prediction: review and assessment.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- MicroHDF: predicting host phenotypes with metagenomic data using a deep forest-based framework.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Microbial influence on blood pressure: unraveling the complex relationship for health insights.Microbiome research reports · 2024Article
- Deep learning in microbiome analysis: a comprehensive review of neural network models.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- MiTree: A Unified Web Cloud Analytic Platform for User-Friendly and Interpretable Microbiome Data Mining Using Tree-Based Methods.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- DeepGAMI: deep biologically guided auxiliary learning for multimodal integration and imputation to improve genotype-phenotype prediction.Genome medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Intersecting Pathways in Bioinformatics and Translational Informatics: A One Health Perspective on Key Contributions and Future Directions.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Article
- MKMR: a multi-kernel machine regression model to predict health outcomes using human microbiome data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- MV-CVIB:Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scientific research is shedding light on the interaction of the gut microbiome with the human host and on its role in human health. Existing machine learning methods have shown great potential in discriminating healthy from diseased microbiome states. Most of them leverage shotgun metagenomic sequencing to extract gut microbial species-relative abundances or strain-level markers. Each of these gut microbial profiling modalities showed diagnostic potential when tested separately; however, no existing approach combines them in a single predictive framework. Here, we propose the Multimodal Variational Information Bottleneck (MVIB), a novel deep learning model capable of learning a joint representation of multiple heterogeneous data modalities. MVIB achieves competitive classification performance while being faster than existing methods. Additionally, MVIB offers interpretable results. Our model adopts an information theoretic interpretation of deep neural networks and computes a joint stochastic encoding of different input data modalities. We use MVIB to predict whether human hosts are affected by a certain disease by jointly analysing gut microbial species-relative abundances and strain-level markers. MVIB is evaluated on human gut metagenomic samples from 11 publicly available disease cohorts covering 6 different diseases. We achieve high performance (0.80 < ROC AUC < 0.95) on 5 cohorts and at least medium performance on the remaining ones. We adopt a saliency technique to interpret the output of MVIB and identify the most relevant microbial species and strain-level markers to the model's predictions. We also perform cross-study generalisation experiments, where we train and test MVIB on different cohorts of the same disease, and overall we achieve comparable results to the baseline approach, i.e. the Random Forest. Further, we evaluate our model by adding metabolomic data derived from mass spectrometry as a third input modality. Our method is scalable with respect to input data modalities and has an average training time of < 1.4 seconds. The source code and the datasets used in this work are publicly available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.