Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35404667›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2022

Clinical Benefit of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling for Advanced Cancers in India.

Aju Mathew, Serena Joseph, Jeffrey Boby, Steve Benny, Janeesh Veedu, Senthil Rajappa, Nitesh Rohatgi, Bhawna Sirohi, Reetu Jain, Vivek Agarwala and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Aju MathewMOSC Medical College, Kolenchery, Ernakulam, Ernakulam, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5482-5708
Serena JosephMOSC Medical College, Kolenchery, Ernakulam, Ernakulam, India.
Jeffrey BobyGovernment Medical College, Kozhikode, India.
Steve BennyGovernment Medical College, Thrissur, India.
Janeesh VeeduUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
Senthil RajappaIndo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Nitesh RohatgiFortis Hospital, Delhi, India.
Bhawna SirohiApollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8093-1531
Reetu JainJaslok Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Vivek AgarwalaNarayana Superspecialty Hospital, Kolkata, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1381-0320
Deepak Kumar ShuklaManipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jaipur, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2507-8106
Anurag MehtaRajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6517-3664
Raja PramanikAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0483-6254
Vineet TalwarRajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9149-6969
Vinayak MakaM. S. Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, India.
Nirmal RautBhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4812-9546

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeComprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay is increasingly used in low-middle-income countries to detect clinically relevant genomic alterations despite its clinical benefits not being well known. Here, we describe the proportion of patients with advanced cancer in India who received targeted therapy for an actionable genetic alteration identified on CGP assays.

methodsThis was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study in adult patients with advanced nonhematologic malignancies who underwent a CGP test. If patients received a targeted therapy for ≥ 6 months, they were considered to have obtained a clinical benefit from the medication, whereas those continuing for ≥ 12 months were considered to have attained an exceptional response. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the proportion of patients with subsequent targeted therapy.

resultsDuring 2019-2020, 12 medical oncologists provided CGP reports for 297 patients; 221 met the inclusion criteria. Patients received a median of two lines (range: 0-5) of prior systemic therapy. On the basis of the CGP assay, 21 patients (10%) received targeted therapy. Among them, 33% was for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification (nonbreast cancer) and 19% for HER2 or epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion mutation (lung cancer). After excluding patients with HER2 or epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertions, 8% of 217 patients received targeted therapy. In the overall cohort of 221 patients, clinical benefit was seen in nine patients (4%), of whom two were exceptional responders (1%).

conclusionWe observed that in a low-middle-income country setting, 10% of patients received targeted therapy on the basis of CGP assay. Only 4% of patients who underwent CGP testing obtained a clinical benefit.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNeoplasmsAdultErbB ReceptorsHumansIndiaRetrospective StudiesErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID35404667
PMCPMC9200397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.