Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35404638›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2022

A randomized controlled trial of moral reconation therapy to reduce risk for criminal recidivism among justice-involved adults in mental health residential treatment.

Daniel M Blonigen, Michael A Cucciare, Thomas Byrne, Paige M Shaffer, Brenna Giordano, Jennifer S Smith, Christine Timko, Joel Rosenthal, David Smelson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02524171 (Improving Treatment Engagement and Outcomes Among Justice-involved Veterans), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02524171 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Treatment Engagement and Outcomes Among Justice-involved Veterans

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2016 to 2021Enrolled344ConditionsAntisocial Personality Disorder, Substance Use DisorderArmsMoral Reconation Therapy (MRT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel M BlonigenHSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation.ORCID 0000-0003-3420-6704
Michael A CucciareCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research.ORCID 0000-0001-5516-609X
Thomas ByrneHSR&D Center for Health Care Organization and Implementation Research.
Paige M ShafferHSR&D Center for Health Care Organization and Implementation Research.
Brenna GiordanoClinical Psychology PhD Program.
Jennifer S SmithHSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation.
Christine TimkoHSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation.
Joel RosenthalVeterans Justice Programs.
David SmelsonHSR&D Center for Health Care Organization and Implementation Research.
Center for Innovation · USResearch Organization of Information and Systems · JPOutcomes Based Healthcare · GBPublic Health Dayton & Montgomery County · USUnited States Department of Justice · US

Funding

Improving Treatment Engagement and Outcomes among Justice-involved VeteransI01HX001570 · VA · VETERANS ADMIN PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYS · PI BLONIGEN, DANIEL MICHAEL, SMELSON, DAVID A · 2018 to 2021
–
HSRD VA I01 HX001570HSRD VA IK6 HX003763HSRD VA RCS 00-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMoral reconation therapy (MRT) is a cognitive-behavioral intervention to reduce risk for criminal recidivism. Despite being implemented widely in correctional settings, there are no randomized controlled trials of MRT, and its effectiveness for reducing recidivism among justice-involved adults in noncorrectional settings is unknown.

methodIn a pragmatic trial, 341 justice-involved patients (95.3% male; 57.8% White/non-Hispanic) admitted to one of three mental health residential treatment programs were randomly assigned to usual care (UC) or UC plus two MRT groups per week for 12 weeks. Follow-ups were conducted at 6- and 12-month postbaseline (71.3% and 74.8% retention, respectively). Primary outcomes were criminal thinking and criminal associates. Secondary outcomes were legal problem severity, days incarcerated in the past 30, rearrested/charged (per official records), substance use, and employment and family/social problems. The study design, analysis, and outcomes were preregistered (ClinicalTrials.gov; ID: NCT02524171).

resultsPatients in both conditions improved over time on most outcomes. In intent-to-treat analyses, the rate of change in outcomes over time did not differ by condition, nor did the prevalence of being rearrested and charged within 1 year of baseline (UC = 20.2%, MRT = 24.9%;

conclusionsIn this study, MRT was not more effective than UC at reducing recidivism risk for patients in mental health residential treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyRecidivismResidential TreatmentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMorals

Identifiers

PMID35404638
PMCPMC9426716
OpenAlexW4223451640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.