Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35404443›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2022

Factors associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) deterioration in glioma patients during the progression-free survival period.

Marijke B Coomans, Linda Dirven, Neil Aaronson, Brigitta G Baumert, Martin van den Bent, Andrew Bottomley, Alba A Brandes, Olivier Chinot, Corneel Coens, Thierry Gorlia and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Challenges in interpreting individual-level changes in health-related quality of life in patients with glioma using minimally important differences (MIDs) and a 4-point Likert scale.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Trial
  2. Cancer-specific utility: clinical validation of the EORTC QLU-C10D in patients with glioblastoma.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Neuro-oncology practice · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Surgical site infections after glioblastoma surgery: boon or bane?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Marijke B CoomansDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Linda DirvenDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9157-9895
Neil AaronsonDivision of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Brigitta G BaumertInstitute of Radiation-Oncology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland.
Martin van den BentThe Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5710-5127
Andrew BottomleyQuality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Alba A BrandesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy.
Olivier ChinotAix-Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, CHU Timone, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, Marseille, France.
Corneel CoensQuality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Thierry GorliaEuropean Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Ulrich HerrlingerDivision of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.
Florence Keime-GuibertGroupe Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, Assistance Publique, Paris, France.
Annika MalmströmDepartment of Advanced Home Care and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Francesca MartinelliQuality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Roger StuppNorthwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois,USA.
Andrea TalacchiDepartment of Neurosciences, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata , Roma, Italia.
Michael WellerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1748-174X
Wolfgang WickNeurology Clinic and National Centre for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6171-634X
Jaap C ReijneveldDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumour Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martin J B TaphoornDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintenance of functioning and well-being during the progression-free survival (PFS) period is important for glioma patients. This study aimed to determine whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL) can be maintained during progression-free time, and factors associated with HRQoL deterioration in this period.

methodsWe included longitudinal HRQoL data from previously published clinical trials in glioma. The percentage of patients with stable HRQoL until progression was determined per scale and at the individual patient level (i.e. considering all scales simultaneously). We assessed time to a clinically relevant deterioration in HRQoL, expressed in deterioration-free survival and time-to-deterioration (the first including progression as an event). We also determined the association between sociodemographic and clinical factors and HRQoL deterioration in the progression-free period.

resultsFive thousand five hundred and thirty-nine patients with at least baseline HRQoL scores had a median time from randomization to progression of 7.6 months. Between 9-29% of the patients deteriorated before disease progression on the evaluated HRQoL scales. When considering all scales simultaneously, 47% of patients deteriorated on ≥1 scale. Median deterioration-free survival period ranged between 3.8-5.4 months, and median time-to-deterioration between 8.2-11.9 months. For most scales, only poor performance status was independently associated with clinically relevant HRQoL deterioration in the progression-free period.

conclusionsHRQoL was maintained in only 53% of patients in their progression-free period, and treatment was not independently associated with this deterioration in HRQoL. Routine monitoring of the patients' functioning and well-being during the entire disease course is therefore important, so that interventions can be initiated when problems are signaled.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansProgression-Free SurvivalQuality of Lifebrain tumordeterioration-free-survivalprogressive diseasetime-to-deterioration

Identifiers

PMID35404443
PMCPMC9713503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.