Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35404422›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2022

A Collaborative Initiative to Establish Genomic Biomarkers for Assessing Tumorigenic Potential to Reduce Reliance on Conventional Rodent Carcinogenicity Studies.

J Christopher Corton, Constance A Mitchell, Scott Auerbach, Pierre Bushel, Heidrun Ellinger-Ziegelbauer, Patricia A Escobar, Roland Froetschl, Alison H Harrill, Kamin Johnson, James E Klaunig and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Navigating complexity in modern toxicology: the role of omics in short-term in vivo studies.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

J Christopher CortonCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6197-2036
Constance A MitchellHealth and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1052-7087
Scott AuerbachDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6294-3069
Pierre BushelBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Heidrun Ellinger-ZiegelbauerInvestigational Toxicology, DD-ED-Toxicology, Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0247-4210
Patricia A EscobarSafety Assessment and Laboratory Animal Resources, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, West Point, Pennsylvania, USA.
Roland FroetschlBfArM-Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Bonn, Germany.
Alison H HarrillDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5544-1338
Kamin JohnsonCorteva Agriscience, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4550-5566
James E KlaunigLaboratory of Investigative Toxicology and Pathology, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Indiana School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Arun R PandiriDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Alexei A PodtelezhnikovGenome and Biomarker Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, West Point, Pennsylvania, USA.
Julia E RagerThe Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2882-5042
Keith Q TanisSafety Assessment and Laboratory Animal Resources, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, West Point, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jan Willem van der LaanSection on Pharmacology, Toxicology and Kinetics, Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alisa VespaTherapeutic Products Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Carole L YaukDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Syril D PettitHealth and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Frank D SistareDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Scientific Cyberinfrastructure Research ProgramZIAES103385 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALKER, VICKIE · 2022 to 2025
$17.4M
ZIA CARCI Carcinogenicity Health Effects innovation Research ProgramZIAES103383 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PANDIRI, ARUN KUMAR · 2022 to 2025
$13.0M
Molecular Pathogenesis of Rodent NeoplasiaZIAES103349 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PANDIRI, ARUN KUMAR · 2020 to 2021
$5.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing recognition across broad sectors of the scientific community that use of genomic biomarkers has the potential to reduce the need for conventional rodent carcinogenicity studies of industrial chemicals, agrochemicals, and pharmaceuticals through a weight-of-evidence approach. These biomarkers fall into 2 major categories: (1) sets of gene transcripts that can identify distinct tumorigenic mechanisms of action; and (2) cancer driver gene mutations indicative of rapidly expanding growth-advantaged clonal cell populations. This call-to-action article describes a collaborative approach launched to develop and qualify biomarker gene expression panels that measure widely accepted molecular pathways linked to tumorigenesis and their activation levels to predict tumorigenic doses of chemicals from short-term exposures. Growing evidence suggests that application of such biomarker panels in short-term exposure rodent studies can identify both tumorigenic hazard and tumorigenic activation levels for chemical-induced carcinogenicity. In the future, this approach will be expanded to include methodologies examining mutations in key cancer driver gene mutation hotspots as biomarkers of both genotoxic and nongenotoxic chemical tumor risk. Analytical, technical, and biological validation studies of these complementary genomic tools are being undertaken by multisector and multidisciplinary collaborative teams within the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute. Success from these efforts will facilitate the transition from current heavy reliance on conventional 2-year rodent carcinogenicity studies to more rapid animal- and resource-sparing approaches for mechanism-based carcinogenicity evaluation supporting internal and regulatory decision-making.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRodentiaAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinogenesisCarcinogenicity TestsCarcinogensGenomicsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinogensadverse outcome pathwaysbiomarkerscancererror-corrected sequencingrisk assessmenttoxicogenomics

Identifiers

PMID35404422
PMCPMC9238304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.