ArticlemBio2022
Inferring Species Compositions of Complex Fungal Communities from Long- and Short-Read Sequence Data.
Article in mBio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling yeast diversity in food fermentation using ITS1-2 amplicon-based metabarcoding.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Microbiome legacy influences necrosis formation in Diplodia sapinea-infected Scots pine shoots.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Fungal ecology in the age of 'omics.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Effects of sequencing platforms on the profiling of root mycorrhizal communities in Pinus densiflora.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Metabarcoding with Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies provides complementary insights into tree seed mycobiota.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Challenges in capturing the mycobiome from shotgun metagenome data: lack of software and databases.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Sterile sentinels and MinION sequencing capture active soil microbial communities that differentiate crop rotations.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The kingdom Fungi is highly diverse in morphology and ecosystem function. Yet fungi are challenging to characterize as they can be difficult to culture and morphologically indistinct. Overall, their description and analysis lag far behind other microbes such as bacteria. Classification of species via high-throughput sequencing is increasingly becoming the norm for pathogen detection, microbiome studies, and environmental monitoring. With the rapid development of sequencing technologies, however, standardized procedures for taxonomic assignment of long sequence reads have not yet been well established. Focusing on nanopore sequencing technology, we compared classification and community composition analysis pipelines using shotgun and amplicon sequencing data generated from mock communities comprising 43 fungal species. We show that regardless of the sequencing methodology used, the highest accuracy of species identification was achieved by sequence alignment against a fungal-specific database. During the assessment of classification algorithms, we found that applying cutoffs to the query coverage of each read or contig significantly improved the classification accuracy and community composition analysis without major data loss. We also generated draft genome assemblies for three fungal species from nanopore data which were absent from genome databases. Our study improves sequence-based classification and estimation of relative sequence abundance using real fungal community data and provides a practical guide for the design of metagenomics analyses focusing on fungi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.