Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35404046›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2022

A Sensitive and Controlled Data-Independent Acquisition Method for Proteomic Analysis of Cell Therapies.

Camille Lombard-Banek, Kerstin I Pohl, Edward J Kwee, John T Elliott, John E Schiel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camille Lombard-BanekNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Material and Measurements Laboratory, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0438-1042
Kerstin I PohlSCIEX, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, United States.
Edward J KweeNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Material and Measurements Laboratory, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.
John T ElliottNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Material and Measurements Laboratory, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.
John E SchielNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Material and Measurements Laboratory, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.
National Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic measurements are uniquely poised to impact the development of cell and gene therapies. With the adoption of rigorous instrumental performance qualifications (PQs), large-scale proteomics can move from a research to a manufacturing control tool. Especially suited, data-independent acquisition (DIA) approaches have distinctive qualities to extend multiattribute method (MAM) principles to characterize the proteome of cell therapies. Here, we describe the development of a DIA method for the sensitive identification and quantification of proteins on a Q-TOF instrument. Using the improved acquisition parameters, we defined a control strategy and highlighted some metrics to improve the reproducibility of SWATH acquisition-based proteomic measurements. Finally, we applied the method to analyze the proteome of Jurkat cells that here serves as a model for human T-cells. Raw and processed data were deposited in PRIDE (PXD029780).

Indexed as

ProteomeProteomicsData AccuracyHumansMass SpectrometryReproducibility of ResultsProteomebiopharmaceuticalbottom-up proteomicscell therapiesdata-independent acquisitionmass spectrometryperformance qualification (PQ)quality control (QC)SWATH acquisition

Identifiers

PMID35404046
PMCPMC9087334
OpenAlexW4223429660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.