Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35404018›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2022

Practical consideration for successful sequential tumor biopsies in first-in-human trials.

Takafumi Koyama, Toshio Shimizu, Jun Sato, Yuki Katsuya, Satoru Iwasa, Shunsuke Kondo, Tatsuya Yoshida, Kazuki Sudo, Makoto Nishino, Yuichi Takiguchi and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Takafumi KoyamaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshio ShimizuDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun SatoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki KatsuyaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru IwasaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunsuke KondoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuya YoshidaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuki SudoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto NishinoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichi TakiguchiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Kan YonemoriDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Noboru YamamotoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. nbryamam@ncc.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-0787-2851
Tokyo National Hospital · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPChiba University · JPNational Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In first-in-human (FIH) trials, sequential tumor biopsies, i.e., two consecutive tumor biopsies, the first performed at baseline (pretreatment) and the second during the early treatment period (on-treatment), provide proof of concept in investigational new drugs. We evaluated the success of sequential tumor biopsies in FIH trials, and explored approaches for improved success rates. We retrospectively reviewed the sequential tumor biopsies required in 17 of 52 FIH trials conducted from 2015 to 2020. One hundred and thirty-eight patients were identified. Success of either pretreatment or on-treatment biopsy alone, and of sequential tumor biopsies, was defined as the acquisition of viable tumor cells and as obtaining tumor cells from both biopsy specimens, respectively. The success rates of pretreatment and on-treatment biopsy were 98.6% and 94.2%, respectively, and of sequential tumor biopsies was 70.3%. Adverse events associated with the pretreatment biopsies (33.3% positive; 72.0% negative) and timing of the first imaging assessment (before on-treatment biopsy = 40.0%; after on-treatment biopsy = 82.7%) correlated with successful sequential tumor biopsies. The reasons for unsuccessful sequential tumor biopsies could be categorized into two groups: 1) patient refusal of the on-treatment biopsy (most frequently due to early disease progression); and 2) absence of tumor cells in the pretreatment or on-treatment biopsy specimen. We propose an approach to achieving greater success in sequential tumor biopsies in FIH trials; the first imaging assessment during the study should be scheduled after on-treatment biopsy. (Registration number UMIN000042487, Date of registration November 18, 2020).

Indexed as

NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansRetrospective StudiesBiopsyClinical TrialDiagnostic ImagingDisease ProgressionTherapeutics/AE

Identifiers

PMID35404018
PMCPMC9288361
OpenAlexW4226082078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.