Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35403975›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2022

Acute phase of Kawasaki disease: a review of national guideline recommendations.

Laura Scherler, Nikolaus A Haas, Anja Tengler, Joseph Pattathu, Guido Mandilaras, André Jakob

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multiresistant Kawasaki Disease in a Young Infant with Giant Aneurysms Growing Fast.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Beaded Coronary Aneurysm in Kawasaki Disease.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura ScherlerDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3168-7274
Nikolaus A HaasDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Anja TenglerDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Joseph PattathuDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Guido MandilarasDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
André JakobDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. andre.jakob@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3580-2268

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Key aspects of the medical management of Kawasaki disease (KD) are not yet supported by a high evidence level, thus making room for individual recommendations. We performed a structured comparison of existing international KD guidelines to analyze potential differences in the implementation of evidence-based KD recommendations regarding diagnosis and therapy. To identify country-specific guidelines, we took a multilateral approach including a comprehensive PubMed literature, online research, and directly contacting national pediatric associations. We then ran a structured guidelines' analysis and evaluated the diagnostic and therapeutic differences in the context of evidence-based medicine. In this structured guideline analysis, we identified nine national and one European guidelines. According to them all, the diagnosis of KD still relies on its clinical presentation with no reliable biomarker recommended. First-line treatment consistently involves only intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy. Recommendations in terms of acetylsalicylic acid, corticosteroids, and additional therapeutic options vary considerably.

conclusionAccording to all guidelines, KD is diagnosed clinically with some variance in defining incomplete KD and being a non-responder to treatment. First-line treatment consistently includes IVIG. Recommendations for additional therapeutic strategies are more heterogeneous. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The diagnosis of KD relies on the clinical presentation, entailing challenges in timely diagnosis. • Other treatment options then IVIG are not supported by a high evidence level, making room for individual recommendations. WHAT IS NEW: • Definition of incomplete KD and being non-responsive to an initial treatment vary to some extent between the national guidelines. • Only IVIG is consistently proposed throughout all guidelines, further therapeutic recommendations vary between the national recommendations.

Indexed as

Mucocutaneous Lymph Node SyndromeAspirinBiomarkersChildEvidence-Based MedicineHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousPractice Guidelines as TopicAspirinBiomarkersImmunoglobulins, IntravenousCoronary artery aneurysmCOVID-19 MISC-CKawasaki diseaseNational guideline

Identifiers

PMID35403975
PMCPMC8995165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.