ArticleInternational wound journal2022
Topical application of oxygen nano-bubble water enhances the healing process of ischaemic skin wound healing in an animal model.
Article in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generation and Application of Ultra-Fine, Long-Term Stable Nanobubble Water: An Evaluation of Inclusion Effects on Aromatic Components and Antimicrobial Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A comparative study of the established methods and evaluation of rat trauma models.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Intelligent electrospinning nanofibrous membranes for monitoring and promotion of the wound healing.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- A Narrative Review on Means to Promote Oxygenation and Angiogenesis in Oral Wound Healing.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Topical application of oxygen nano-bubble water enhances the healing process of ischaemic skin wound healing in an animal model.International wound journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the usefulness of oxygen nano-bubble water as an oxygen-rich liquid for wound healing, by analysing its effect on the wound-healing process in rats. Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 36) were divided into two groups: the wound-healing model group without ischaemia (n = 18) and the ischaemic group (n = 18). In each rat, an 8 mm diameter full-thickness skin defect wound was created on the back; in rats in the ischaemic group, a bi-pedicle flap (width, 3.6 cm; length, 8.6 cm) was also created. The wounds of six rats from each group were then treated with AQUACELL soaked with oxygen nano-bubble water, and compared with those of control rats, which were treated with purified water (same as that used to make the oxygen nano-bubble water; n = 6) or physiological saline solution (n = 6). There was no significant difference in epithelialisation rate and number of days of epithelialisation among the subgroups in the wound-healing model group. In the ischaemic group, there was a significant improvement in the wound-healing rate and time of the oxygen nano-bubble water subgroup. Oxygen nano-bubble water therapy enhances the ischaemic wound-healing process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.