Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35403225›Full record

Trial reportActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2022

Senicapoc treatment in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory insufficiency-A randomized, open-label, phase II trial.

Asger Granfeldt, Lars W Andersen, Mikael F Vallentin, Ole Hilberg, Jørgen B Hasselstrøm, Lambert K Sørensen, Susie Mogensen, Steffen Christensen, Anders M Grejs, Bodil S Rasmussen and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The vascular perspective on acute and chronic lung disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Asger GranfeldtDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7241-6131
Lars W AndersenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5752-8082
Mikael F VallentinDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ole HilbergDepartment of Medicine, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Jørgen B HasselstrømSection for Forensic Chemistry, Department of Forensic Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lambert K SørensenSection for Forensic Chemistry, Department of Forensic Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Susie MogensenDepartment of Biomedicine, Pulmonary and Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Steffen ChristensenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anders M GrejsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bodil S RasmussenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2190-145X
Klaus T KristiansenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Thomas StrømDepartment of Anesthesiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Isik S JohansenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Olav L SchjørringDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7749-6003
Ulf SimonsenDepartment of Biomedicine, Pulmonary and Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKVejle Sygehus · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the current study was to determine if treatment with senicapoc, improves the PaO

methodsInvestigator-initiated, randomized, open-label, phase II trial in four intensive care units (ICU) in Denmark. We included patients aged ≥18 years and admitted to an ICU with severe respiratory insufficiency due to COVID-19. The intervention consisted of 50 mg enteral senicapoc administered as soon as possible after randomization and again after 24 h. Patients in the control group received standard care only. The primary outcome was the PaO

resultsTwenty patients were randomized to senicapoc and 26 patients to standard care. Important differences existed in patient characteristics at baseline, including more patients being on non-invasive/invasive ventilation in the control group (54% vs. 35%). The median senicapoc concentration at 72 h was 62.1 ng/ml (IQR 46.7-71.2). The primary outcome, PaO

conclusionsTreatment with senicapoc resulted in a significantly lower PaO

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory InsufficiencyAcetamidesAdolescentAdultHumansRespiration, ArtificialSARS-CoV-2Triphenylmethyl CompoundsAcetamidessenicapocTriphenylmethyl CompoundsARDSCOVID-19respiratory insufficiencySARS-CoV-2Senicapoc

Identifiers

PMID35403225
PMCPMC9111301
OpenAlexW4223489051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.