Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35403218›Full record

ArticleJournal of adolescence2022

Loneliness and personal well-being in young people: Moderating effects of individual, interpersonal, and community factors.

Claire Goodfellow, Deborah Hardoon, Joanna Inchley, Alastair H Leyland, Pamela Qualter, Sharon A Simpson, Emily Long

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of adolescence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The influence of educational transitions on loneliness and mental health from emerging adults' perspectives.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claire GoodfellowMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5990-8150
Deborah HardoonWhat Works Centre for Wellbeing, London, UK.
Joanna InchleyMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8322-8817
Alastair H LeylandMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3741-7099
Pamela QualterManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6114-3820
Sharon A SimpsonMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6219-1768
Emily LongMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1512-4471
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBWellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist OfficeEconomic and Social Research CouncilMedical Research Council MC_UU_00022/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/2Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/3Medical Research Council MR/S015078/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLoneliness is prevalent among young people. But, there is little work exploring the association between loneliness with well-being among this age group. Framed by social-ecological theory, we examined demographic, interpersonal, and community factors associated with personal wellbeing and, critically, identified malleable moderators of the relationship between loneliness and well-being that could be targeted in intervention efforts.

methodsWe used cross-sectional, secondary data from 965 young people (aged 16-24) from the Community Life Survey in England. Loneliness was measured using a single-item direct measure; personal wellbeing was measured through a composite measure containing items assessing happiness, life satisfaction, and a sense that life is worthwhile (α = 0.88). Regression techniques were used to assess associations between individual, interpersonal, and community factors and well-being, and to identify moderators of the relationship between loneliness and well-being.

resultsLoneliness was negatively associated with well-being. Chatting with neighbors and having people to provide help moderated the relationship between loneliness and well-being. Full-time students and those with good physical health had higher well-being while being a carer was predictive of lower well-being. All community variables were strongly associated with increased well-being. Of all interpersonal variables investigated, only having people to count on was associated with increased well-being.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that supportive relationships and close community ties are important for reducing the negative impact of loneliness on youth well-being. Interventions to improve well-being could benefit from targeting these aspects of young people's social and community lives, while acknowledging individual vulnerabilities, such as poor physical health.

Indexed as

LonelinessPersonal SatisfactionAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandHumansSurveys and Questionnaireslonelinessmoderationsocial ecologicalwellbeingyoung people

Identifiers

PMID35403218
PMCPMC9320932
OpenAlexW4223436265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.