Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35403204›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2023

Bayesian group testing with dilution effects.

Curtis Tatsuoka, Weicong Chen, Xiaoyi Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Curtis TatsuokaDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, CaseWestern Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Weicong ChenDepartment of Computer and Data Science, CaseWestern Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0573-8808
Xiaoyi LuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California Merced, Merced, CA, 95343, USA cmt66@case.edu.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR002548 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOMSEY, GRACE A · 2018 to 2022
$35.5M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Northern Ohio, Catalyzing Linkages to Equity in Health (CLE Health)UM1TR004528 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GRACE A MCCOMSEY · 2023 to 2026
$32.1M
Statistical Models of NP Functioning for MH ServicesR01MH065538 · NIMH · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TATSUOKA, CURTIS M · 2003 to 2005
$683k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002548NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004528NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Bayesian framework for group testing under dilution effects has been developed, using lattice-based models. This work has particular relevance given the pressing public health need to enhance testing capacity for coronavirus disease 2019 and future pandemics, and the need for wide-scale and repeated testing for surveillance under constantly varying conditions. The proposed Bayesian approach allows for dilution effects in group testing and for general test response distributions beyond just binary outcomes. It is shown that even under strong dilution effects, an intuitive group testing selection rule that relies on the model order structure, referred to as the Bayesian halving algorithm, has attractive optimal convergence properties. Analogous look-ahead rules that can reduce the number of stages in classification by selecting several pooled tests at a time are proposed and evaluated as well. Group testing is demonstrated to provide great savings over individual testing in the number of tests needed, even for moderately high prevalence levels. However, there is a trade-off with higher number of testing stages, and increased variability. A web-based calculator is introduced to assist in weighing these factors and to guide decisions on when and how to pool under various conditions. High-performance distributed computing methods have also been implemented for considering larger pool sizes, when savings from group testing can be even more dramatic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public Health SurveillanceAlgorithmsBayes TheoremCOVID-19 TestingHumansPandemicsBayesianCOVID-19Dilution effectsGroup testingLatticesOptimal rates of convergenceSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID35403204
PMCPMC10583721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.