Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35403195›Full record

ArticleBiology open2022

Odours of cancerous mouse congeners: detection and attractiveness.

Flora Gouzerh, Bruno Buatois, Maxime R Hervé, Maicol Mancini, Antonio Maraver, Laurent Dormont, Frédéric Thomas, Guila Ganem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Urinary VOCs as biomarkers of early stage lung tumour development in mice.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Flora GouzerhCentre de Recherches Écologiques et Évolutives sur le Cancer, Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs: Ecologie, Genetique, Evolution et Contrôle, UMR IRD 224-CNRS 5290-Université de Montpellier, 34394, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4696-3318
Bruno BuatoisCentre d'ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, 34293, Montpellier, France.
Maxime R HervéInstitut de Génétique Environnement et Protection des Plantes, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France.
Maicol ManciniInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Inserm U1194-ICM-Université de Montpellier, 34298, Montpellier, France.
Antonio MaraverInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Inserm U1194-ICM-Université de Montpellier, 34298, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5527-5680
Laurent DormontCentre d'ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, 34293, Montpellier, France.
Frédéric ThomasCentre de Recherches Écologiques et Évolutives sur le Cancer, Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs: Ecologie, Genetique, Evolution et Contrôle, UMR IRD 224-CNRS 5290-Université de Montpellier, 34394, Montpellier, France.
Guila GanemInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, 34095, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical communication plays a major role in social interactions. Cancer, by inducing changes in body odours, may alter interactions between individuals. In the framework of research targeting non-invasive methods to detect early stages of cancer development, this study asked whether untrained mice could detect odour changes in cancerous congeners. If yes, were they able to detect cancer at an early developmental stage? Did it influence female preference? Did variations in volatile organic components of the odour source paralleled mice behavioural responses? We used transgenic mice strains developing or not lung cancer upon antibiotic ingestion. We sampled soiled bedding of cancerous mice (CC) and not cancerous mice (NC), at three experimental conditions: before (T0), early stage (T2) and late stage (T12) of cancer development. Habituation/generalisation and two-way preference tests were performed where soiled beddings of CC and NC mice were presented to wild-derived mice. The composition and relative concentration of volatile organic components (VOC) in the two stimuli types were analysed. Females did not show directional preference at any of the experimental conditions, suggesting that cancer did not influence their choice behaviour. Males did not discriminate between CC and NC stimuli at T0 but did so at T2 and T12, indicating that wild-derived mice could detect cancer at an early stage of development. Finally, although the VOC bouquet differed between CC and NC it did not seem to parallel the observed behavioural response suggesting that other types of odorant components might be involved in behavioural discrimination between CC and NC mice.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsVolatile Organic CompoundsAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceOdorantsVolatile Organic CompoundsBody odoursEGFR oncogenic mutationFemale preferenceLung cancerMus musculus domesticusOdour discriminationVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID35403195
PMCPMC9065363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.