Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35403127›Full record

ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Predicts Poor Prognosis of Patients After Curative Surgery for Gastric Cancer.

Hirotaka Furuke, Daiki Matsubara, Takeshi Kubota, Jun Kiuchi, Hidemasa Kubo, Takuma Ohashi, Hiroki Shimizu, Tomohiro Arita, Yusuke Yamamoto, Hirotaka Konishi and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hirotaka FurukeDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Daiki MatsubaraDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takeshi KubotaDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Jun KiuchiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hidemasa KuboDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takuma OhashiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroki ShimizuDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomohiro AritaDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yusuke YamamotoDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hirotaka KonishiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Ryo MorimuraDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Atsushi ShiozakiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshiaki KuriuDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hisashi IkomaDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hitoshi FujiwaraDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kazuma OkamotoDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Eigo OtsujiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a nutritional measure for predicting the risk of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. We evaluated the utility of the GNRI to predict the short-term and long-term outcomes after curative surgery for gastric cancer (GC). Patients and Methods: Patients who underwent curative surgery for GC between 2008 and 2016 were reviewed (n=795). We classified patients into two groups according to the GNRI (high GNRI: low and no risk; low GNRI: major and moderate risk) and compared the utility of the GNRI. Results: A low GNRI was an independent prognostic factor for poorer overall survival (hazard ratio=2.34, p<0.001). The GNRI tended to be a better prognostic indicator in elderly patients with GC. Low GNRI was associated with postoperative complications (odds ratio=2.27, p=0.002), especially in patients aged ≥75 (odds ratio=2.26, p=0.042). Conclusion: Low GNRI was associated with poor prognosis and occurrence of postoperative complications in patients with GC, especially in elderly patients.

Indexed as

complicationgastric cancerGeriatric Nutritional Risk Indexprognostic factor

Identifiers

PMID35403127
PMCPMC8962766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.