Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35403091›Full record

ArticlePhytomedicine plus : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology2022

In silico,

Damle Latha, Damle Hrishikesh, Ganju Shiban, C Chandrashekar, B R Bharath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Phytomedicine plus : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Heliyon · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Efficacy of Kan JangPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Damle LathaComputational Biology, Atrimed Biotech LLP, Banglore, 560100, India.
Damle HrishikeshAtrimed Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd, Banglore, 560001, India.
Ganju ShibanAtrimed Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd, Banglore, 560001, India.
C ChandrashekarComputational Biology, Atrimed Biotech LLP, Banglore, 560100, India.
B R BharathComputational Biology, Atrimed Biotech LLP, Banglore, 560100, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the absence of a specific drug for COVID 19, treatment with plant extracts could be an option worthy of further investigation and has motivated to evaluate the safety and anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of plant extracts. Purpose: To screen the phytochemicals for anti-SARS-CoV-2 Method: The phytochemicals for anti-SARS-CoV-2 were screened Results: The percentage of cell viability for E4, E5 and E2 treated VeroE6 cells were remarkably good on the 24th and 48th hour of treatment. The Conclusion: The study demonstrated the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity

Indexed as

Anti-SARS-CoV-2CytotoxicityIn vivo toxicityMolecular dockingPlant extracts

Identifiers

PMID35403091
PMCPMC8801592
OpenAlexW4225651354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.