ArticleJTCVS techniques2022
Five-minute test to prevent postcardiotomy reexploration.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemostatic therapies and ambiguous abnormal bleeding in cardiac operating rooms: A real-world, case-based evaluation of clinical practices.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Article
- Commentary: Doctor, your patient is bleeding.JTCVS techniques · 2022Article
- Commentary: Good things come to those who wait.JTCVS techniques · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the 5-minute test (FMT), developed to record the amount of pericardial bleeding in patients undergoing general cardiac surgery, and determine the relationship between this test and postcardiotomy bleeding. Methods: The medical records of 573 patients who underwent adult cardiac surgery between January 2016 and December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the FMT group included patients who underwent general cardiac surgery between January 2018 and December 2019 (n = 278), and the control group included patients who underwent general cardiac surgery between January 2016 and December 2017 (n = 295). The postcardiotomy reexploration rate due to intrapericardial bleeding or cardiac tamponade within 1 week after surgery and the amount of bleeding until 2 days after surgery were compared. The FMT procedure involved counting the amount of bleeding by packing 4 to 6 surgical gauze sheets for 5 minutes. Sternal closure was performed when the amount of blood measured by the FMT was <100 g. Results: Compared with the control group, the FMT group had a significantly lower incidence of postcardiotomy reexploration (1.5% vs 5.7%; Conclusions: The FMT is an objective and effective tool for estimating postoperative bleeding during cardiac surgery that can prevent postcardiotomy reexploration and reduce the amount of postcardiotomy bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.