ArticleIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology2020
For Motion Assistance Humans Prefer to Rely on a Robot Rather Than on an Unpredictable Human.
Article in IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human impedance modulation to improve visuo-haptic perception.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- During haptic communication, the central nervous system compensates distinctly for delay and noise.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- How virtual and mechanical coupling impact bimanual tracking.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Interaction with a reactive partner improves learning in contrast to passive guidance.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Comparative Analysis of Model-Based Predictive Shared Control for Delayed Operation in Object Reaching and Recognition Tasks With Tactile Sensing.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
- Promoting Motor Variability During Robotic Assistance Enhances Motor Learning of Dynamic Tasks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Motor Learning in Robot-Based Haptic Dyads: A Review.IEEE transactions on hapticsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.