ArticleIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology2020
A Multimodal Pancreas Phantom for Computer-Assisted Surgery Training.
Article in IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 3D Modelling for Preoperative Planning, Intraoperative Navigation, and Training in Pancreatic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Training of surgical residents and the establishment of innovative surgical techniques require training phantoms that realistically mimic human anatomy. Because animal models have their limitations due to ethical aspects, costs, and the required efforts to set up such training, artificial phantoms are a promising alternative. In the field of image-guided surgery, the challenge lies in developing phantoms that are accurate both anatomically and in terms of imaging properties, while taking the cost factor into account. With respect to the pancreas, animal models are less suitable because their anatomy differs significantly from human anatomy and tissue properties rapidly degrade in the case of ex vivo models. Nevertheless, progress with artificial phantoms has been sparse, although the need for innovative, minimally invasive therapies that require adequate training is steadily increasing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.