Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402888›Full record

ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2022

Expanding DNA database effectiveness.

Ray A Wickenheiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Forensic genetics in the omics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DNA forensics at forty: the way forward.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Revolution of Animal Genomics in Forensic Sciences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Proactive crime scene response optimizes crime investigation.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ray A WickenheiserNew York State Police Crime Laboratory System, Albany, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA databases effectively develop investigative leads, with database size being directly proportional to increased chances of solving crimes as demonstrated by a business case including a universal STR database example. DNA database size can be expanded physically by increasing the number and type of qualifying offenses, adding arrestees, or moving towards a universal database. The theoretical size of a DNA database can also be increased scientifically by using the inherent nature of DNA sharing by biologically related individuals by using an indirect matching strategy including Partial Matching, Familial Searching, and Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG). A new strategy is introduced using areas of shared DNA as a search key to locate potential relatives for further kinship evaluation. New search key strategies include Y-STR, mtDNA, and X Chromosome searching to locate potential relatives, coupled with kinship and genetic genealogical research, as well as expanded use of unidentified human remains (UHRs).

Indexed as

DNA databaseEnhanced DNA Indirect matchingForensic DNAForensic genetic genealogyGenetic genealogyIndirect comparisonInvestigative genetic genealogyKinship analysisMitochondrial DNA searchingUnidentified human remainsUniversal DNA DatabaseX Chromosome searchingY-STR Searching

Identifiers

PMID35402888
PMCPMC8991311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.