ArticleBlood science (Baltimore, Md.)2019
Current status and hurdles for CAR-T cell immune therapy.
Article in Blood science (Baltimore, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vivo engineering of CAR-T cells: delivery strategies and clinical translation.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- AnFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Advancing breast cancer treatment through dual targeting CAR T cell therapy.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Use of CAR T-cell for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment: a review study.Cancer gene therapy · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells have emerged as novel and promising immune therapies for the treatment of multiple types of cancer in patients with hematological malignancies. There are several key components critical for development and application of CAR-T therapy. First, the design of CAR vectors can considerably affect several aspects of the physiological functions of these T cells. Moreover, despite the wide use of γ-retrovirus and lentivirus in mediating gene transfer into T cells, optimal CAR delivery systems are also being developed and evaluated. In addition, several classes of mouse models have been used to evaluate the efficacies of CAR-T cells; however, each model has its own limitations. Clinically, although surprising complete remission (CR) rates were observed in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), lymphoma, and multiple myeloma (MM), there is still a lack of specific targets for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Leukemia relapse remains a major challenge, and its mechanism is presently under investigation. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity are life-threatening adverse effects that need to be carefully treated. Several factors that compromise the activities of anti-solid cancer CAR-T cells have been recognized, and further improvements targeting these factors are the focus of the development of novel CAR-T cells. Overcoming the current hurdles will lead to optimal responses of CAR-T cells, thus paving the way for their wide clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.