Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402741›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2022

Acceptance of physical activity monitoring in cancer patients during radiotherapy, the GIROfit phase 2 pilot trial.

S Boeke, F Hauth, S G Fischer, H Lautenbacher, V Bizu, D Zips, C Gani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mobile applications in radiation oncology-current choices and future potentials.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S BoekeUniversity Hospital Tübingen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tübingen, Germany.
F HauthUniversity Hospital Tübingen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tübingen, Germany.
S G FischerUniversity Hospital Tübingen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tübingen, Germany.
H LautenbacherUniversity Hospital Tübingen, Section for Information Technology, Tübingen, Germany.
V BizuUniversity Hospital Tübingen, Section for Information Technology, Tübingen, Germany.
D ZipsUniversity Hospital Tübingen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tübingen, Germany.
C GaniUniversity Hospital Tübingen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tübingen, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In radiotherapy the timely identification of patients needing intervention and supportive care due to side effects is an important task especially in the outpatient setting. Activity trackers as an increasingly used lifestyle device may enable physicians to monitor patient's physical activity (PA) and to intervene early during the course of radiotherapy. Objective: The primary aim of this trial was to assess patient acceptance of PA monitoring in an outpatient setting and to correlate changes in PA with toxicity and changes in quality of life. Methods: Patients undergoing radio(chemo-)therapy with a curative intent were eligible to participate in this prospective pilot phase II trial. Patients were instructed to wear a commercially available activity tracker during the course of radiotherapy and four weeks afterwards. Quality of life (QoL) and fatigue was scored using the Functional assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy questionnaire. A linear regression was performed to determine baseline activity and changes in step counts during radiotherapy. Results: We included 23 patients in this trial. Two withdrew consent before the start of treatment, two patients were excluded after prophylactic feeding tube placement and prolonged recovery. Compliance in the remaining 19 patients was high, with availability of step-counts on 92% of the days. Baseline step counts were 6274 for breast cancer patients and 3621 for patients with other entities. Decreasing activity during radiotherapy coincided with the development of side effects and declines in quality of life. Conclusions: Activity trackers as tool to monitor PA during and after radiotherapy were accepted by a majority of the patients included in the current trial. Observed changes in PA correlated with patient reported side effects and QoL in some of the patients.

Indexed as

Activity trackersECOG, Eastern cooperative group performance statuseHealthePROM, electronic patient reported outcome measuresFACIT, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness TherapyFACT-G, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy GeneralPA, physical activityPEG, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomyPhysical activityPWB, physical well beingQoL, quality of lifeRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35402741
PMCPMC8991372
OpenAlexW4223507325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.