Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402740›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2022

Surface guided radiation therapy: An international survey on current clinical practice.

V Batista, M Gober, F Moura, A Webster, M Oellers, M Ramtohul, M Kügele, P Freislederer, M Buschmann, G Anastasi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A technology-specific risk analysis of surface guided radiation therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Affordable realtime respiratory monitoring system for radiation oncology.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Article
  13. Use of surface tracking recordings to identify pitfalls during surface-guided radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A novel SGRT system for real-time optical surface tracking or guidance.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

V BatistaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
M GoberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
F MouraHospital CUF Descobertas, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal.
A WebsterRadiotherapy and Proton Beam Therapy, University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
M OellersMAASTRO Clinic, Department of Medical Physics, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
M RamtohulDepartment of Medical Physics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham.
M KügeleDepartment of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
P FreisledererDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
M BuschmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
G AnastasiSt. Luke's Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Physics, United Kingdom.
E SteinerInstitute for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
H Al-HallaqDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, USA.
J LehmannRadiation Oncology Department, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) is being increasingly implemented into clinical practice across a number of techniques and irradiation-sites. This technology, which is provided by different vendors, can be used with most simulation- and delivery-systems. However, limited guidelines and the complexity of clinical settings have led to diverse patterns of operation. With the aim to understand current clinical practice a survey was designed focusing on specifics of the clinical implementation and usage. Materials and methods: A 32-question survey covered: type and number of systems, quality assurance (QA), clinical workflows, and identification of strengths/limitations. Respondents from different professional groups and countries were invited to participate. The survey was distributed internationally via ESTRO-membership, social media and vendors. Results: Of the 278 institutions responding, 172 had at least one SGRT-system and 136 use SGRT clinically. Implementation and QA were primarily based on the vendors' recommendations and phantoms. SGRT was mainly implemented in breast RT (116/136), with strong but diverse representation of other sites. Many (58/135) reported at least partial elimination of skin-marks and a third (43/126) used open-masks. The most common imaging protocol reported included the combination of radiographic imaging with SGRT. Patient positioning (115/136), motion management (104/136) and DIBH (99/136) were the main applications.Main barriers to broader application were cost, system integration issues and lack of demonstrated clinical value. A lack of guidelines in terms of QA of the system was highlighted. Conclusions: This overview of the SGRT status has the potential to support users, vendors and organisations in the development of practices, products and guidelines.

Indexed as

Clinical practicesMotion managementSGRTSurface-guidedSurvey

Identifiers

PMID35402740
PMCPMC8984757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.