Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402739›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2022

PD-1 and PD-L1 expression predict regression and prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Holger H Göbel, Luitpold V R Distel, Thomas Aigner, Maike J Büttner-Herold, Gerhard G Grabenbauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Holger H GöbelDepartment of Gastroenterology, REGIOMED Klinikum Lichtenfels, Germany.
Luitpold V R DistelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
Thomas AignerDepartment of Pathology, REGIOMED Klinikum Coburg, Germany.
Maike J Büttner-HeroldDepartment of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
Gerhard G GrabenbauerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, REGIOMED Klinikum Coburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: PD-1 and PD-L1 are involved in anticancer immunosurveillance, and their expression may be predictive for therapeutic effectiveness of specific antibodies. Their influence on response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) and prognosis in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) remains to be defined. Materials and methods: Between 10/2004 and 06/2018, complete pre-RCT biopsy-specimens were available from 76 patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic OAC scheduled for trimodality therapy. We evaluated intra- and peritumoural expression of CD8, PD-1 and PD-L1 in pre-treatment specimens to determine their influence on tumour regression grade and survival. PD-1 and PD-L1 expression were considered positive (+) if ≥1% of all cells were stained positive, otherwise negative (-); densities of CD8+ cells were categorized as being high (Hi) or low (Lo) according to the median. Results: A negative PD-L1 expression in peritumoural cells predicted a poor tumour regression (RD 0.24 [95% CI 0.03-0.44], p = 0.023). A positive PD-1 expression in intra- as well as peritumoural cells was identified as an unfavourable prognostic factor (HR 0.52 [95% CI 0.29-0.93], p = 0.028; HR 0.50 [0.25-0.99], p = 0.047, respectively). With respect to CD8+ infiltration, positive PD-1 and PD-L1 expressions attenuated its favourable prognostic effect in intratumoural area (LoCD8/PD1 + vs. HiCD8/PD1-: HR 0.25 [0.09-0.69], p = 0.007; LoCD8/PDL1+ vs. HiCD8/PDL1-: HR 0.32 [0.12-0.89], p = 0.028) and were associated with negative outcome when seen in peritumoural area (HiCD8/PD1+ vs. LoCD8/PD1-: HR 0.29 [0.11-0.74], p = 0.010); HiCD8/PDL1+ vs. LoCD8/PDL1-: HR 0.33 [0.12-0.90], p = 0.031). Conclusions: PD-1 and PD-L1 expression were identified to be of predictive and prognostic value in patients with OAC, particularly when considering CD8+ infiltration. Further validation by a large size dataset is required.

Indexed as

CD8+Esophageal adenocarcinomaPD-1PD-L1Radiochemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35402739
PMCPMC8991306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.