ReviewMovement disorders clinical practice2022
Neuroimaging Pearls from the MDS Congress Video Challenge. Part 1: Genetic Disorders.
Review in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CADASIL: A NOTCH3-associated cerebral small vessel disease.Journal of advanced research · 2024Review
- The Most Illustrative Imaging Cases from the Video Challenge.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We selected several "imaging pearls" presented during the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) Video Challenge for this review. While the event, as implicated by its name, was video-centered, we would like to emphasize the important role of imaging in making the correct diagnosis. We divided this anthology into two parts: genetic and acquired disorders. Genetic cases described herein were organized by the inheritance pattern and the focus was put on the imaging findings and differential diagnoses. Despite the overlapping phenotypes, certain described disorders have pathognomonic MRI brain findings that would provide either the "spot" diagnosis or result in further investigations leading to the diagnosis. Despite this, the diagnosis is often challenging with a broad differential diagnosis, and hallmark findings may be present for only a limited time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.