Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402609›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2022

A Comprehensive Review of Computation-Based Metal-Binding Prediction Approaches at the Residue Level.

Nan Ye, Feng Zhou, Xingchen Liang, Haiting Chai, Jianwei Fan, Bo Li, Jian Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PrOMet: Accurate and Robust Metal-Binding Site and Type Prediction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Interpretable prediction of zinc ion location in proteins with ZincSight.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nan YeSchool of Finance and Economics, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang 464000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-4011
Feng ZhouSchool of Computer and Information Technology, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China.
Xingchen LiangSchool of Computer and Information Technology, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China.
Haiting ChaiCollege of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Jianwei FanSchool of Computer and Information Technology, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China.
Bo LiCollege of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Jian ZhangSchool of Computer and Information Technology, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7155-7760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clear evidence has shown that metal ions strongly connect and delicately tune the dynamic homeostasis in living bodies. They have been proved to be associated with protein structure, stability, regulation, and function. Even small changes in the concentration of metal ions can shift their effects from natural beneficial functions to harmful. This leads to degenerative diseases, malignant tumors, and cancers. Accurate characterizations and predictions of metalloproteins at the residue level promise informative clues to the investigation of intrinsic mechanisms of protein-metal ion interactions. Compared to biophysical or biochemical wet-lab technologies, computational methods provide open web interfaces of high-resolution databases and high-throughput predictors for efficient investigation of metal-binding residues. This review surveys and details 18 public databases of metal-protein binding. We collect a comprehensive set of 44 computation-based methods and classify them into four categories, namely, learning-, docking-, template-, and meta-based methods. We analyze the benchmark datasets, assessment criteria, feature construction, and algorithms. We also compare several methods on two benchmark testing datasets and include a discussion about currently publicly available predictive tools. Finally, we summarize the challenges and underlying limitations of the current studies and propose several prospective directions concerning the future development of the related databases and methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProteinsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinProspective StudiesProtein BindingProteins

Identifiers

PMID35402609
PMCPMC8989566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.