Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402571›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Birth Weight and the Risk of Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Report From the Large Population-Based UK Biobank Cohort Study.

Xin Huang, Jun Liu, Lu Qi, Jonathan D Adachi, Jing Wu, Ziyi Li, Qiong Meng, Guowei Li, Gregory Y H Lip

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Xin HuangCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Methodology (CCEM), Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Jun LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Lu QiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, United States.
Jonathan D AdachiDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jing WuKey Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Ziyi LiCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Methodology (CCEM), Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Qiong MengDepartment of Pediatrics, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Guowei LiCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Methodology (CCEM), Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Gregory Y H LipLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNMcMaster University · CATulane University · USUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Birth weight has been reported to be associated with the risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, the relationship remains inconclusive. Here, we aimed to prospectively assess the associations between birth weight and CVD risk using the data from UK Biobank, a large-scale, prospective cohort study. Methods: We included 270,297 participants who were free of CVD at baseline and reported their birth weight for analyses. The primary outcome was incident CVD. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for potential confounding variables. Results: During a median follow-up of 8.07 years (IQR: 7.4-8.7 years), 10,719 incident CVD events were recorded. The HRs for low birth weight vs. normal birth weight (2.5-4.0 kg) were 1.23 (95% CI: 1.09-1.38) for risk of incident CVD, 1.52 (95% CI: 1.18-1.95) for stroke, 1.33 (95% CI: 1.07-1.64) for myocardial infarction, and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01-1.32) for CHD. For the ones with low birth weight, the risk of CVD is reduced by 11% for every kilogram of birth weight gain. The association of low birth weight with CVD was stronger among those younger than 55 years ( Conclusion: Low birth weight was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. These findings highlight the longstanding consequence of low birth weight on cardiovascular system.

Indexed as

associationbirth weightcardiovascular diseasecohortepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID35402571
PMCPMC8987713
OpenAlexW4220940076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.