ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Comparison of the Effect of Different Local Analgesia Administration Methods in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty under local anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- The surgical management trends of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: 5-year experience in one institution.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Although various studies have described the methods of administering anesthesia during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs), there is still no consensus on the optimal treatment regimen. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of three application methods of local analgesia administration in PV for treating OVCFs. Methods: A total of 96 patients with OVCFs were reviewed and divided into three groups (A: lidocaine, B: ropivacaine, C: lidocaine + ropivacaine). The visual analog scale (VAS), blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), blood oxygen saturation (BOS), and surgery time were recorded during the following different points: before puncture, during the puncture, cement injection, and 4-h after surgery. Results: The mean age of the patients was 74.13 ± 7.02 years in group A, 70.47 ± 5.50 years in group B, and 73.07 ± 7.51 years in group C, without significant difference. No significant differences were found in sex, age, hospital stay, surgery time, blood loss, and cement volume of the patients. In the periods of before puncture and 4-h after surgery, the VAS in group C decreased significantly than that in the periods of the puncture, cement injection, and immediately after surgery. Overall, there were no significant differences in systolic BP, diastolic BP, HR, and BOS during the different periods among the groups except HR in the period of the puncture in group C, which was slower than that in other groups, and HR in the period of cement injection in group A, which was faster than the other two groups. A correlation was observed between the VAS and the periods of cement injection ( Conclusion: Compared with the other two methods, the use of lidocaine in combination with ropivacaine could effectively relieve intraoperative pain, making the patients feel more comfortable and experience better recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.