ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Cerebral Microbleed Automatic Detection System Based on the "Deep Learning".
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of Deep Learning in Detecting Cerebral Microbleeds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Deep Learning-Based Detection, Classification, and Segmentation of Cerebral Microbleeds.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Attention-enhanced segmentation network for automated cerebral microbleed detection and burden assessment.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Automated Quantification of Cerebral Microbleeds in SWI: Association with Vascular Risk Factors, White Matter Hyperintensity Burden, and Cognitive Function.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Cerebral small vessel disease lesion segmentation methods: A systematic review.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2025Review
- SHIVA-CMB: a deep-learning-based robust cerebral microbleed segmentation tool trained on multi-source T2*GRE- and susceptibility-weighted MRI.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Brainchop: Providing an Edge Ecosystem for Deployment of Neuroimaging Artificial Intelligence Models.Aperture neuro · 2024Article
- Risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients using anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation after cerebral microbleeds combined with acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Construction of a Medical Micro-Object Cascade Network for Automated Segmentation of Cerebral Microbleeds in Susceptibility Weighted Imaging.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To validate the reliability and efficiency of clinical diagnosis in practice based on a well-established system for the automatic segmentation of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs). Method: This is a retrospective study based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (MRI-SWI) datasets from 1,615 patients (median age, 56 years; 1,115 males, 500 females) obtained between September 2018 and September 2019. All patients had been diagnosed with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) with clear cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) on MRI-SWI. The patients were divided into training and validation cohorts of 1,285 and 330 patients, respectively, and another 30 patients were used for internal testing. The model training and validation data were labeled layer by layer and rechecked by two neuroradiologists with 15 years of work experience. Afterward, a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) was applied to the MRI data from the training and validation cohorts to construct a deep learning system (DLS) that was tested with the 72 patients, independent of the aforementioned MRI cohort. The DLS tool was used as a segmentation program for these 72 patients. These results were evaluated and revised by five neuroradiologists and subjected to an output analysis divided into the missed label, incorrect label, and correct label. The interneuroradiologists DLS agreement rate, which was assessed using the interrater agreement kappas test, was used for the quality analysis. Results: In the detection and segmentation of the CMBs, the DLS achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.72. In the evaluation of the independent clinical data, the neuroradiologists reported that more than 90% of the lesions were directly detected and less than 10% of lesions were incorrectly labeled or the label was missed by our DLS. The kappa value for interneuroradiologist DLS agreement reached 0.79 on average. Conclusion: Based on the results, the automatic detection and segmentation of CMBs are feasible. The proposed well-trained DLS system might represent a trusted tool for the segmentation and detection of CMB lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.