Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402427›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Cerebral Microbleed Automatic Detection System Based on the "Deep Learning".

Pingping Fan, Wei Shan, Huajun Yang, Yu Zheng, Zhenzhou Wu, Shang Wei Chan, Qun Wang, Peiyi Gao, Yaou Liu, Kunlun He and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cerebral small vessel disease lesion segmentation methods: A systematic review.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pingping FanDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wei ShanNational Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Huajun YangNational Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Yu ZhengNational Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Zhenzhou WuNational Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Shang Wei ChanNational Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Qun WangNational Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Peiyi GaoDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yaou LiuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Kunlun HeLaboratory of Translational Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Binbin SuiNational Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To validate the reliability and efficiency of clinical diagnosis in practice based on a well-established system for the automatic segmentation of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs). Method: This is a retrospective study based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (MRI-SWI) datasets from 1,615 patients (median age, 56 years; 1,115 males, 500 females) obtained between September 2018 and September 2019. All patients had been diagnosed with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) with clear cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) on MRI-SWI. The patients were divided into training and validation cohorts of 1,285 and 330 patients, respectively, and another 30 patients were used for internal testing. The model training and validation data were labeled layer by layer and rechecked by two neuroradiologists with 15 years of work experience. Afterward, a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) was applied to the MRI data from the training and validation cohorts to construct a deep learning system (DLS) that was tested with the 72 patients, independent of the aforementioned MRI cohort. The DLS tool was used as a segmentation program for these 72 patients. These results were evaluated and revised by five neuroradiologists and subjected to an output analysis divided into the missed label, incorrect label, and correct label. The interneuroradiologists DLS agreement rate, which was assessed using the interrater agreement kappas test, was used for the quality analysis. Results: In the detection and segmentation of the CMBs, the DLS achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.72. In the evaluation of the independent clinical data, the neuroradiologists reported that more than 90% of the lesions were directly detected and less than 10% of lesions were incorrectly labeled or the label was missed by our DLS. The kappa value for interneuroradiologist DLS agreement reached 0.79 on average. Conclusion: Based on the results, the automatic detection and segmentation of CMBs are feasible. The proposed well-trained DLS system might represent a trusted tool for the segmentation and detection of CMB lesions.

Indexed as

cerebral microbleedclinical evaluationdeep learningneural networksegmentation

Identifiers

PMID35402427
PMCPMC8988858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.