ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Development and Validation of a Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting Benign and Malignant Gallbladder Polypoid Lesions.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative differentiation of benign and malignant gallbladder lesions using multimodal ultrasound radiomics: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Establishing a radiomics model using contrast-enhanced ultrasound for preoperative prediction of neoplastic gallbladder polyps exceeding 10 mm.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Radiomic nomograms in CT diagnosis of gall bladder carcinoma: a narrative review.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Advances in the management of gallbladder polyps: establishment of predictive models and the rise of gallbladder-preserving polypectomy procedures.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Review
- The value of CT findings combined with inflammatory indicators for preoperative differentiation of benign and malignant gallbladder polypoid lesions.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a preoperative nomogram of differentiating benign and malignant gallbladder polypoid lesions (GPs) combining clinical and radiomics features. Methods: The clinical and imaging data of 195 GPs patients which were confirmed by pathology from April 2014 to May 2021 were reviewed. All patients were randomly divided into the training and testing cohorts. Radiomics features based on 3 sequences of contrast-enhanced computed tomography were extracted by the Pyradiomics package in python, and the nomogram further combined with clinical parameters was established by multiple logistic regression. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated by discrimination and calibration. Results: Among 195 GPs patients, 132 patients were pathologically benign, and 63 patients were malignant. To differentiate benign and malignant GPs, the combined model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.950 as compared to the radiomics model and clinical model with AUC of 0.929 and 0.925 in the training cohort, respectively. Further validation showed that the combined model contributes to better sensitivity and specificity in the training and testing cohorts by the same cutoff value, although the clinical model had an AUC of 0.943, which was higher than 0.942 of the combined model in the testing cohort. Conclusion: This study develops a nomogram based on the clinical and radiomics features for the highly effective differentiation and prediction of benign and malignant GPs before surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.