Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402263›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Proteomic-Based Machine Learning Analysis Reveals PYGB as a Novel Immunohistochemical Biomarker to Distinguish Inverted Urothelial Papilloma From Low-Grade Papillary Urothelial Carcinoma With Inverted Growth.

Minsun Jung, Cheol Lee, Dohyun Han, Kwangsoo Kim, Sunah Yang, Ilias P Nikas, Kyung Chul Moon, Hyeyoon Kim, Min Ji Song, Bohyun Kim and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The proteomic landscape shows oncologic relevance in cystitis glandularis.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Minsun JungDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Cheol LeeDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Dohyun HanTransdisciplinary Department of Medicine and Advanced Technology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Kwangsoo KimTransdisciplinary Department of Medicine and Advanced Technology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Sunah YangTransdisciplinary Department of Medicine and Advanced Technology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Ilias P NikasSchool of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Kyung Chul MoonDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyeyoon KimDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Min Ji SongCenter for Medical Innovation, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Bohyun KimDepartment of Pathology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyebin LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Han Suk RyuDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KREuropean University Cyprus · CYKangbuk Samsung Hospital · KRKonkuk University Medical Center · KRSeoul National University · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The molecular biology of inverted urothelial papilloma (IUP) as a precursor disease of urothelial carcinoma is poorly understood. Furthermore, the overlapping histology between IUP and papillary urothelial carcinoma (PUC) with inverted growth is a diagnostic pitfall leading to frequent misdiagnoses. Methods: To identify the oncologic significance of IUP and discover a novel biomarker for its diagnosis, we employed mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of IUP, PUC, and normal urothelium (NU). Machine learning analysis shortlisted candidate proteins, while subsequent immunohistochemical validation was performed in an independent sample cohort. Results: From the overall proteomic landscape, we found divergent 'NU-like' (low-risk) and 'PUC-like' (high-risk) signatures in IUP. The latter were characterized by altered metabolism, biosynthesis, and cell-cell interaction functions, indicating oncologic significance. Further machine learning-based analysis revealed SERPINH1, PKP2, and PYGB as potential diagnostic biomarkers discriminating IUP from PUC. The immunohistochemical validation confirmed PYGB as a specific biomarker to distinguish between IUP and PUC with inverted growth. Conclusion: In conclusion, we suggest PYGB as a promising immunohistochemical marker for IUP diagnosis in routine practice.

Indexed as

biomarkersdifferential diagnosisimmunohistochemistryinverted urothelial papillomamachine learning analysispapillary urothelial carcinomatandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS)transitional cell carcinoma (TCC)

Identifiers

PMID35402263
PMCPMC8987228
OpenAlexW4220836124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.