Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402246›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Dosimetric Evaluation and Clinical Application of Radioactive Iodine-125 Brachytherapy Stent in the Treatment of Malignant Esophageal Obstruction.

Zhe Ji, Qianqian Yuan, Lei Lin, Chao Xing, Xusheng Zhang, Sen Yang, Yuliang Jiang, Haitao Sun, Kaixian Zhang, Junjie Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhe JiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qianqian YuanDepartment of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Zaozhuang, China.
Lei LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chao XingDepartment of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Zaozhuang, China.
Xusheng ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Zaozhuang, China.
Sen YangDepartment of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Zaozhuang, China.
Yuliang JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Haitao SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kaixian ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Zaozhuang, China.
Junjie WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tengzhou Central People's Hospital · CNPeking University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the dosimetric characteristics and the clinical application of radioactive iodine-125 brachytherapy stent (RIBS) in malignant esophageal obstruction. Methods: The dose distribution of RIBS with different seed spacing, diameter and length was studied by treatment planning system (TPS) calculation, thermoluminescence dosimeter (TLD) measurement and Monte Carlo (MC) data fitting. And the data of esophageal cancer patients who were treat with this type of RIBS was analyzed retrospectively. Results: Doses around the RIBS calculated by the TPS lay between those measured by the TLDs and those simulated by the MC, and the differences between the three methods were significant (p<0.05), the overall absolute dose differences among the three methods were small. Dose coverage at 1.5 cm from the center was comprehensive when the activity reached 0.6 mCi. Both the conformability and the uniformity of isodose lines produced by a seed spacing of 1.0 cm were superior to those produced by a seed spacing of 1.5 cm. The data of 50 patients treated with RIBS was analyzed. They were followed up until February 2020 when all of the patients died. The overall improvement rate of dysphagia after RIBS implant was 90%. Moderate and severe complications with an incidence of more than 10% were hematemesis (28%), pain (20%), and lung infection (10%). Stent restenosis occurred in 4 patients at a median interval of 108 days from the procedure. The overall incidence of fatal complications was 38% (including hematemesis, infection and asphyxia). The median survival time of patients with and without a history of radiotherapy were 3.4 months and 6 months, respectively, the difference of which was significant (p=0.021). No other factors affecting survival were identified. For patients with and without a history of radiotherapy, the incidences of fatal complications were 51.7% and 19%, respectively (p=0.019). No correlation between dose and stent restenosis was found. Conclusion: TPS calculations are suitable for clinical applications. RIBS can effectively alleviate obstructive symptoms for patients with malignant esophageal obstruction, but the incidence of fatal complications was high, care should be taken when choosing this treatment.

Indexed as

dosimetryefficacyesophageal cancerradioactive iodine-125 seedstent

Identifiers

PMID35402246
PMCPMC8987528
OpenAlexW4221113939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.