Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402242›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Patient-Reported Financial Burden Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Tamir N Sholklapper, Michael L Creswell, Alexandra T Payne, Michael Markel, Abigail Pepin, Michael Carrasquilla, Alan Zwart, Malika Danner, Marilyn Ayoob, Thomas Yung and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tamir N SholklapperGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States.
Michael L CreswellGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States.
Alexandra T PayneGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States.
Michael MarkelGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States.
Abigail PepinDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Michael CarrasquillaDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Alan ZwartDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Malika DannerDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Marilyn AyoobDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Thomas YungDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Brian CollinsDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Deepak KumarJulius L. Chambers Biomedical Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States.
Nima AghdamDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess, Boston, MA, United States.
Simeng SuyDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Ryan A HankinsDepartment of Urology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Keith KowalczykDepartment of Urology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Sean P CollinsDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Georgetown University · USNorth Carolina Central University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives: In patients with localized prostate cancer, 5-fraction, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been found to offer comparable oncologic outcomes and potential for improved treatment compliance compared to conventional, 40-plus fraction radiation therapy (RT). Recent studies of oncologic patient experiences have highlighted both the impact of therapy-associated financial toxicity (FT) on treatment adherence and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Methods: A cross-sectional assessment of FT after SBRT was performed using the 12-item COST questionnaire. The total questionnaire score (range 0-44) was used to evaluate the FT grade (0-3), with a higher COST value representing lower grade. The patient zip code was used to approximate the distance from the index hospital. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the average COST score (0-4) are performed. Results: The response rate was 57.5% (332 of 575 consented patients) with 90.7%, 8.2%, and 1.1% experiencing grade 0, 1, and 2 FT, respectively, with no grade 3. Unemployment or disability, non-white race, low income, and concurrent hormonal therapy were associated with a statistically significant worse FT (lower COST value) on univariate and multivariate analyses (p < 0.05). Education level and insurance status significant were evaluated on univariate analysis only. There was a non-statistically significant difference in age, marital status, time since treatment, and distance from the index hospital. Conclusions: SBRT was associated with low FT. However, statistically significant socioeconomic disparities in FT remain despite ultra-hypofractionated treatment.

Indexed as

CyberKnifefinancial toxicityHRQoL (health-related quality of life)prostate cancerSBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy)

Identifiers

PMID35402242
PMCPMC8990911
OpenAlexW4226139259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.