ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
A Nomogram Predicting the Progression-Free Survival of Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients With Venous Thrombus After Surgery.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Venous Tumor Thrombus Level in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Impact on Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.Cancers · 2026Review
- Development and validation of nomograms and integrated software incorporating preoperative C-reactive protein level for prognostic prediction of nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Results from the International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer (INMARC) Registry.World journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To demonstrate the progression-free survival (PFS) of nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with venous thrombus after radical nephrectomy and venous thrombectomy (RN-VT) and to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the PFS of patients after RN-VT. Materials and Methods: We reported our prospective follow-up data of RCC patients with venous thrombus from January 2014 to September 2020 (n = 199). We used the Kaplan-Meier method to assess the PFS. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine the predictors. Nomograms predicting the PFS was established, and external validation was performed. Calibration curves and decision curves were generated to assess the predictive efficacy and clinical benefit. Results: After a median follow-up of 32 months, 79 patients (39.7%) had disease progression and the median PFS was 41.0 months (95% CI 34.8-53.2 months). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year PFS rates were 78.4%, 45.4%, and 30.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that Fuhrman grade [grade 4: hazard ratio (HR) 1.92, 95% CI 1.10-3.34, P = 0.02], pathological type (papillary RCC: HR 3.02, 95% CI 1.79-5.10, P < 0.001), perinephric fat invasion (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.12-2.10, P = 0.007), sarcomatoid differentiation (HR 2.97, 95% CI 1.24-7.13, P = 0.02) were associated with a worse PFS, and adjuvant therapy (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18-0.59, P < 0.001) could lead to a better PFS. A nomogram based on the predictors was externally validated to have good discrimination and calibration, and it could improve PFS prediction to obtain a clinical benefit. Conclusions: We constructed and validated a nomogram to predict the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year PFS of M0 RCC patients with venous thrombus after surgery. The model can help identify patients who can benefit the most from surgery and develop the criteria for clinical trial enrollment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.