Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402175›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2022

Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic-review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Jingjing Li, Yuanyan Tang, Zhiping Huang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. CAR-macrophage: Breaking new ground in cellular immunotherapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Immunotherapy of Multiple Myeloma: Current Status as Prologue to the Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jingjing LiYangtze University School of Medicine, Jingzhou, China.
Yuanyan TangDepartment of Hematology, Jingzhou Central Hospital, Jingzhou, China.
Zhiping HuangDepartment of Hematology, Jingzhou Central Hospital, Jingzhou, China.
Jingzhou Central Hospital · CNYangtze University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant tumor originating from plasma cells in the bone marrow. The existing treatment methods can prolong the survival time of patients, but they still face the problems of myeloma relapse and refractory disease. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is a new cellular immunotherapy that can target and recognize antigens and kill tumor cells but the efficacy and safety data varied in different studies. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to understand its efficacy and safety. Methods: Literature published from January 2015 to November 2021 was obtained by searching the keywords "CAR-T", "CAR-T Cell", and "Multiple Myeloma" by computer using the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases according to the PICOS (Participants, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes, Study type) criteria. The quality of the literature was assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tool for prevalence studies. The complete response rate, the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) above grade 3, and the overall incidence of adverse reactions were used as the outcome indicators. The pooled rates were performed and analyzed using the R language toolkit. Results: A total of 10 studies including 353 study cases were included. Meta-analysis showed that the pooled complete response rate of CAR-T therapy in the treatment of MM was 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.50, 0.60), the pooled incidence of CRS was 0.55, 95% CI: (0.50, 0.60), and the pooled incidence of serious adverse reactions was 0.92, 95% CI: (0.88, 0.95). Subgroup analysis was performed based on antigen types or costimulatory molecules, and there was no significant difference in the efficacy of CAR-T and the incidence of CRS between the two subgroups (P>0.05). Conclusions: As a new immunotherapy strategy with great potential, CAR-T has a significant effect in the treatment of MM, but its safety needs to be further improved. The types of costimulatory molecules and CAR-T antigens can affect its efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

cellular immunotherapyChimeric antigen receptor (CAR)multiple myeloma (MM)

Identifiers

PMID35402175
PMCPMC8990219
OpenAlexW4223630566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.