ReviewCureus2022
Amplatzer Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder Device-Related Complications.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thrombectomy and Extraction of Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder With Repair of Atrial Septum: A Minimally Invasive Approach.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2026Article
- Delayed Migration of an Amplatzer PFO Occluder to the Infrarenal Abdominal Aorta: Successful Endovascular Snare Retrieval.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Innovating Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure: Preclinical Evaluation of the First Iranian-Developed Nitinol Occluder in a Sheep Model.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- From Catheter Complication to Surgical Success: Urgent Retrieval of an Embolized Amplatzer Device and Valve Repair.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- The safety, efficacy, and influencing factors of biodegradable versus metallic occluders in the treatment of migraine patients with patent foramen ovale.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Decompression illness: a comprehensive overview.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2024Article
- Experience in patent foramen ovale closure with the CERA Lifetech occluder in patients with cryptogenic stroke.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a standard variant that is present in 25% of the whole adult population. In a certain population, PFO can lead to cerebrovascular accidents. Mechanism of cerebrovascular accidents can be by paradoxical embolization from the right circulation or in situ thrombosis. Diagnosis of a PFO-responsible cerebrovascular accident is based on a thorough work-up to exclude other possible etiologies and detect PFO on trans-thoracic or trans-esophageal echocardiography with bubble study and/or Doppler. Over the last few years, multiple studies have supported that percutaneous PFO closure is superior to medical therapy in the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular accidents. However, numerous adverse events have been linked to PFO closure devices in general compared to medical therapy as new-onset atrial fibrillation, residual shunt, device-related thrombus, bleeding, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and inter-atrial septal erosions. Amplatzer device is one of the PFO occluder devices approved by the FDA. Device-related adverse events have been addressed by comparing the Amplatzer device with other PFO occluder devices. Based on the new data, we expect to see more complications related to PFO closure in the coming few years. We reviewed different studies that looked at the PFO closure-related complications and the trials comparing adverse events in the Amplatzer PFO occluder device compared to other devices. Amplatzer PFO occluder device is either superior or non-statistically different from other PFO occluder devices related to new-onset atrial fibrillation and residual shunt. More studies are needed to address the other less common adverse events. Since many of the device-related complications appear many years after device placement, a long-term follow-up is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.