ArticleCureus2022
Rescue Stenting for Refractory Large Vessel Occlusions in the Thrombectomy Era: Intracranial Use of Coronary Stents in Low-mid Economic Settings.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rescue Stenting for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFailed mechanical thrombectomy due to a refractory emergent large vessel occlusion (RELVO) in patients presenting with an acute stroke poses a major challenge to the outcomes.
objectiveWe demonstrate the use of coronary stents in the intracranial circulation as rescue stenting for an already expensive mechanical thrombectomy procedure in a mid-low socioeconomic setting.
methodsA retrospective, multicenter study was conducted between December 2015 and January 2021. The studied cohort were patients who required the use of a rescue stenting using a coronary stent for emergent large vessel occlusion to avoid failed recanalization. Failed recanalization was defined as failed vessel recanalization after at least two passes. Patient demographic data, procedure specifics, type of stent used, and procedural outcomes were collected.
resultsA total of 26 patients with acute ischemic stroke were included from eight different centers across India. Out of 26 patients, 19 (73.0%) were male and seven were female (26.9%). The mean age was 53.6 years, the youngest patient was 23 years old and the eldest was 68 years old. Seven patients (26.9%) had posterior circulation stroke due to occlusion of the vertebral or basilar artery and 19 patients (73.0%) had anterior circulation stroke median NIHSS at presentation was 16 (range 10 to 28) in anterior circulation stroke and 24 (range 16 to 30) in posterior circulation stroke. Intravenous thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) was given in three patients (11.5%). The hospital course of two patients was complicated by symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), which was fatal. Favorable revascularization outcome and favorable functional outcome was achieved in 22 patients (84.6%), three patients passed away (11.5%), and one patient was lost to follow up.
conclusionsOverall, our study finds that rescue stenting using coronary stents can potentially improve outcomes in refractory large vessel occlusions while minimizing costs in low-mid economic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.