ArticleClinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2022
Antagonism in Daily Life: An Exploratory Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.
Article in Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Socioaffective Dynamics of Psychopathy in Daily Life.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025Article
- Personality traits as predictors of PTSD and depression symptoms following exposure-based treatment in an intensive outpatient program.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2025Article
- An exploratory study on disinhibition and interpersonal outcomes in daily life.Personality disorders · 2025Article
- Personality Pathology and Momentary Stress Processes.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024Article
- Surveying veterans affairs mental health care providers on experiences working with veteran patients with antagonistic clinical presentations.Psychological services · 2024Article
- Callous-Unemotional Traits in Adolescents' Daily Life: Associations with Affect and Emotional and Conduct Problems.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2024Article
- Rivalry and admiration-seeking in a social competition: From traits to behaviors through contextual cues.Personality disorders · 2023Article
- Psychometric evaluation of a Visual Interpersonal Analog Scale.Psychological assessment · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interpersonal Antagonism is one of the major domains of maladaptive personality. Structural-based investigations of Antagonism have generally been consistent in highlighting the more specific antagonistic traits (e.g., manipulativeness, callousness) that underlie the broader domain. However, less work has attempted to merge structural and functional accounts of Antagonism to assess how specific antagonistic traits manifest in daily life. This exploratory study examined how Antagonism and its specific features relate to outcomes assessed using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods. Across four independent EMA samples (N range=297-396; total N = 1,365; observations per outcome=5,419-17,735), we investigated how antagonistic traits related to theoretically relevant, EMA-based outcomes (e.g., affect, empathy, coldness-warmth in interpersonal interactions). Results showed robust findings across samples and operationalizations of Antagonism (e.g., Antagonism's relation with negative affect), along with more mixed results (e.g., Antagonism's relation with different measures of empathy). We discuss future research directions for structural and functional accounts of Antagonism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.