Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402060›Full record

ArticleJournal of analytical methods in chemistry2022

Determination of Glyphosate, Glufosinate, and Their Major Metabolites in Tea Infusions by Dual-Channel Capillary Electrophoresis following Solid-Phase Extraction.

Manh Huy Nguyen, Thanh Dam Nguyen, Minh Tuan Vu, Hong Anh Duong, Hung Viet Pham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of analytical methods in chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manh Huy NguyenKey Laboratory of Analytical Technology for Environmental Quality and Food Safety Control (KLATEFOS), VNU University of Science (VNU-HUS), Vietnam National University, Hanoi (VNU), 334 Nguyen Trai Street, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3391-8750
Thanh Dam NguyenKey Laboratory of Analytical Technology for Environmental Quality and Food Safety Control (KLATEFOS), VNU University of Science (VNU-HUS), Vietnam National University, Hanoi (VNU), 334 Nguyen Trai Street, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5077-5793
Minh Tuan VuKey Laboratory of Analytical Technology for Environmental Quality and Food Safety Control (KLATEFOS), VNU University of Science (VNU-HUS), Vietnam National University, Hanoi (VNU), 334 Nguyen Trai Street, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-0626
Hong Anh DuongKey Laboratory of Analytical Technology for Environmental Quality and Food Safety Control (KLATEFOS), VNU University of Science (VNU-HUS), Vietnam National University, Hanoi (VNU), 334 Nguyen Trai Street, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4692-2831
Hung Viet PhamKey Laboratory of Analytical Technology for Environmental Quality and Food Safety Control (KLATEFOS), VNU University of Science (VNU-HUS), Vietnam National University, Hanoi (VNU), 334 Nguyen Trai Street, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9016-0694
Vietnam National University, Hanoi · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, two analytical procedures were developed and validated using dual-channel capillary electrophoresis-coupled contactless conductivity detection (CE-C4D) followed by solid-phase extraction (SPE) for simultaneous determination of glyphosate (GLYP), glufosinate (GLUF), and their two major metabolites, aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) and 3-(methylphosphinico) propionic acid (MPPA), respectively, in a popular beverage such as tea infusions. GLYP, GLUF, and AMPA were analyzed in the first channel using background electrolyte (BGE) of 1 mM histidine (His) adjusted to pH 2.75 by acetic acid (Ace). In contrast, MPPA was quantified in the second channel with a BGE of 30 mM His adjusted to pH 6.7 by 3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) and 10 µM of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). In addition, the samples of tea infusions were treated using SPE with 10 mL of 0.5 mM HCl in methanol as eluent. At the optimized conditions, the method detection limit (MDL) of GLYP, GLUF, AMPA, and MPPA is 0.80, 1.56, 0.56, and 0.54

Identifiers

PMID35402060
PMCPMC8993582
OpenAlexW4226141704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.