Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35402025›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2022

Stereotactic radiotherapy for spinal hemangioblastoma - disease control and volume analysis in long-term follow up.

Jakub Cvek, Lukas Knybel, Stefan Reguli, Radim Lipina, Pavla Hanzlikova, Petr Šilhán, Kamila Resova, Tomas Blazek, Martin Palicka, David Feltl

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jakub CvekDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Lukas KnybelDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-6606
Stefan ReguliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Radim LipinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Pavla HanzlikovaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Petr ŠilhánDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Kamila ResovaDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Tomas BlazekDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Martin PalickaDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
David FeltlDepartment of Oncology, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
University Hospital Ostrava · CZGeneral University Hospital in Prague · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This retrospective analysis evaluated the long-term outcome of spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment for hemangioblastomas. Materials and methods: Between 2010 and 2018, 5 patients with 18 Von-Hippel Lindau-related pial-based spinal hemangioblastomas were treated with fractionated SBRT. After precisely registering images of all relevant datasets, we delineated the gross tumor volume, spinal cord (including intramedullary cysts and/or syrinxes), and past radiotherapy regions. A sequential optimization algorithm was used for dose determinations, and patients received 25-26 Gy in five fractions or 24 Gy in three fractions. On-line image guidance, based on spinal bone structures, and two orthogonal radiographs were provided. The actuarial nidus control, surgery-free survival, cyst/syrinx changes, and progression-free survival were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Results: The median follow-up was 5 years after SBRT. Patients displayed one nidus progression, one need of neurosurgery, and two cyst/syrinx progressions directly connected to symptom worsening. No SBRT-related complications or acute adverse radiation-related events occurred. However, one asymptomatic radiological sign of myelopathy occurred two years after SBRT. All tumors regressed; the one-year equivalent tumor volume reduction was 0.2 mL and the median volume significantly decreased by 28% (p = 0.012). Tumor volume reductions were not correlated with the mean (p = 0.19) or maximum (p = 0.16) dose. Conclusions: SBRT for pial-based spinal hemangioblastomas was an effective, safe, viable alternative to neurosurgery in asymptomatic patients. Escalating doses above the conventional dose-volume limits of spinal cord tolerance showed no additional benefit.

Indexed as

hemangioblastomamyelopathySBRTVon-Hippel Lindau

Identifiers

PMID35402025
PMCPMC8989444
OpenAlexW4226353461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.